but I'd rather watch Johnson.
One drawback is that Harbajan's performances though basically came in only the last two out of three tests in that series, He started the first test well but was eventually hit out of the park by Gilchrist. Whereas the others had performances that were more spread out.In Wisden's ranking of 100 greatest spells, Harbhajan had 4 entries from that one series (and something similar in DoG's ratings iirc?). Greatest bowling performance in a test series comfortably.
Edit: https://www.rediff.com/cricket/2001/jul/30bow100.htm
Not necessarily. Subcontinental batsmen on SC wickets are a far more tougher challenge than non SC side on SC wickets. For example even with a bowling side with Murali which was well suited for spinning wickets, best performers against SL were Indians and Pakistanis. Infact Pakistanis beat us at home than any other side.One drawback is that Harbajan's performances though basically came in only the last two out of three tests in that series, He started the first test well but was eventually hit out of the park by Gilchrist. Whereas the others had performances that were more spread out.
The reason I prefer Imran's is that it is far tougher to take wickets as a pacer in Pakistan than as a spinner in India. To take 30 wickets in Karachi, Faisalabad and Hyderbad as a pacer is amazing. Though I grant that Harbi faced a better batting lineup.
very good point from Migs. Aus on turning wickets is almost never a strong propositionNot necessarily. Subcontinental batsmen on SC wickets are a far more tougher challenge than non SC side on SC wickets. For example even with a bowling side with Murali which was well suited for spinning wickets, best performers against SL were Indians and Pakistanis. Infact Pakistanis beat us at home than any other side.
Yea that Sachin / Steyn duel was fantastic. Great bowling by Steyn throughout that match particularly, but the series as a whole tooFor watchability, my favourite is Steyn vs India in 2010/11. The nagpur spell was great too but his bowling in all 3 games in the return series in SA was pure swing bowling porn. Have never seen outswing like that before or since.
I thought that series was peak Steyn but for some reason at that stage of his career he always seemed to lose a gear in the second innings of each test. Especially in Cape Town where he didnt seem to threaten to push for victory on the final day.For watchability, my favourite is Steyn vs India in 2010/11. The nagpur spell was great too but his bowling in all 3 games in the return series in SA was pure swing bowling porn. Have never seen outswing like that before or since.