Mr Casson
Cricketer Of The Year
Yeah that's his dress size.Deja moo said:Unfortunately, theyre the same number....48-48-48.
Yeah that's his dress size.Deja moo said:Unfortunately, theyre the same number....48-48-48.
How exactly is he not played as a specialist batsman? Since the start of 2003, including his recent poor run of form, his record is 1557 runs @ 43.25. That's more than adequate for a specialist batsman. His bowling is simply an added bonus, and is quite handy in ODIs.bryce said:funny how no one has been talking about how bad his bowling form has been aswell(he's certainly not played as a specialist batsman)
In all honesty, do people expect much from him with the ball?bryce said:funny how no one has been talking about how bad his bowling form has been aswell(he's certainly not played as a specialist batsman)
Maybe just a light slap, 'cause those figures are still extremely bad. On the other hand, maybe you're right and an uppercut is needed, 'cause Chappell's record was FOUR ducks, and they were in tests, not ODIs.Crazy Sam said:Oh, and Symonds has made 0,0,0,20,0,0,31 which is hardly '5 ducks in a row' so the original poster deserves an uppercut.
I think he was actually dropped from the Bushrangers team... Hussey, that is!cricket player said:Bring a new player in the team.like husely who is playing domestic cricket and playing for victoria.
It's only not too bad if he's taking a lot of wickets.Crazy Sam said:symonds's bowling E/R in one dayers is 4.89
Wickets are irrelevant if you ask Richard... but let's steer clear of that.marc71178 said:It's only not too bad if he's taking a lot of wickets.
To be fair, there was a Cricinfo article which compared it to Chappell's record.Slow Love™ said:Maybe just a light slap, 'cause those figures are still extremely bad. On the other hand, maybe you're right and an uppercut is needed, 'cause Chappell's record was FOUR ducks, and they were in tests, not ODIs.
Not sure how much today's innings helped him, but there's no doubt Symonds' spot is in some peril.
probably because he is a useless bowler, and no one really expected him to do much better?bryce said:funny how no one has been talking about how bad his bowling form has been aswell(he's certainly not played as a specialist batsman)
wickets are relevant if you have a decent enough ER. taking 1/30 from 5 overs is simply poor.Adamc said:Wickets are irrelevant if you ask Richard... but let's steer clear of that.