• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

All-Time World XIs: Discussion Thread

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
It's a really terrible idea to be overly restrictive in these things.

Your suggestion seems to enforce a team balance where there is exactly one bowling all-rounder, and they are a pacer. Sure, maybe most people agree with that for this team. But there's going to be people who want no bowling all-rounders, people who want two bowling all-rounders and asking for a #8 makes the whole thing become a mess. Personally I might respond Knott!
No we can debate and decide these things and team makeup beforehand.

My suggestion is simply to vote based on batting position from 1 to 11.
 

Thala_0710

International Captain
Most people voting now do realize that 3 pacers are going to get selected (in what ever order). You vote for 2 now, whoever you consider most essential, and whether or not to include any secondary skills is upto you....
Now when the first 2 have gotten selected, you vote for the third one based on what works best now for the XI
 

Thala_0710

International Captain
I always just assume this is for Tests in which case there isn't really any reason to include Grace. If it is all cricket ever played he gets in easily.
I think it's all red ball cricket being played with whatever weights you want to tests and FC.... Plus if it's just test cricket only too, he surely can still get in too?
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Most people voting now do realize that 3 pacers are going to get selected (in what ever order). You vote for 2 now, whoever you consider most essential, and whether or not to include any secondary skills is upto you....
Now when the first 2 have gotten selected, you vote for the third one based on what works best now for the XI
Why not vote three pacers up front then?

Anyways I disagree.
 

Top