capt_Luffy
Hall of Fame Member
Not playing Kuldeep here is so dumb that it's borderline impressive.
Averaged around 35 with the gloves as well. Not poor by any meansIirc he averaged north of 45 in top order, and without the gloves, giving him the gloves was a mistake.
The idea that his SCG game - where he basically ensured Australia would win with his first three or four overs of the fourth innings - would have got him a locked down spot feels borderline "too stupid to be true" territory. Surely that can't be it.I'm convinced the Indian selectors don't actually watch test matches. Prasidh has never not bowled utter rubbish at test level. Apart from this series, he'a also almost exclusively played in games where the pitches have been complete minefields. Almost lost us a game in SA when he bowled pies on a pre WW1-esque pitch where getting 30 was an achievement and he's only being selected for this tour imo because (a) he's tall and (b) because he scammed some wickets in Australia with some dreadful bowling on another crazy helpful pitch. The selectors basically just looked at the scorecard for that game, went "Omg he picked up 6 wickets " and said ok you're going to England. The worst thing for India would be if he picks up some jammy wickets here too and gets more chances because of it.
Only when that happens and then India lose again on day 5, will a dickhead like Gambhir realise how big a fool he is that he's learnt jack-all from this BS strategy of playing just 3 proper bowlers.. It hardly ever works as India found out in Australia.This bowling showing their real level
Prashit is horrible and so are our spinners. I think England will get to 500 before end of day's play at this rate
Ames was before my time, Jack Russell wasn't a great batsman but he was one of England's best batsmen in the 1989 Ashes series, scored a great ton.England has produced great wk bats, apart from Russell who was average all the others were amazing batsman too.
Ames is the second greatest wk bat of all time.
I mean, I was absolutely 100% right.Idk which gambhiring is worse
The sad part is, this is EXACTLY what happened. That Sydney Game gave him a sure berth, and likely the fact he got 6 wickets in the last game made them pick him here without delving much into it.The idea that his SCG game - where he basically ensured Australia would win with his first three or four overs of the fourth innings - would have got him a locked down spot feels borderline "too stupid to be true" territory. Surely that can't be it.
Not the Gill way. Put more lads on the boundary and bring Krishna back.Both are in their 90s. Bring the field up ffs. Force them to play a false shot. Poor captaincy
I admittedly didn't watch the back half of the last game because I was so thoroughly bored of what I'd been watching in the first two innings, but otherwise I think I've seen 90% of his games and I honestly cannot recall watching a worse frontline bowler for a non-minnow nation. I'm sure I've seen one, I just don't remember it. Sincerely would pick your average Shield bowler over him.The sad part is, this is EXACTLY what happened. That Sydney Game gave him a sure berth, and likely the fact he got 6 wickets in the last game made them pick him here without delving much into it.
He legit went at 6.5 RPO. I don't really think I can stress enough how much that killed the game for us.I admittedly didn't watch the back half of the last game because I was so thoroughly bored of what I'd been watching in the first two innings, but otherwise I think I've seen 90% of his games and I honestly cannot recall watching a worse frontline bowler for a non-minnow nation. I'm sure I've seen one, I just don't remember it. Sincerely would pick your average Shield bowler over him.