my senior team isn't worth your time but if you're up for a youth friendly I'll send you a challenge
)
. Grat's on the win dude. Pretty pleased overall, we didn't disgrace ourselves in the face of a team quite a bit stronger than ours. Difference was your strength of batting, but hopefully my batsmen should grow fairly well over the season coming. Quite looking forward to seeing how our youth season turns out, sitting at third in 2.2 in the WI at the moment and ratings wise there's only one team worse than us in the league so we're not doing too badly. Hopefully I'll make a decent bit of cash off the bowler I'm selling, and can bring in a youth bat to bolster the middle order a bit.
Technique goes with batting, bowling and keeping/fielding - ie the main disciplines of cricket. If someone has incredible technique but atrocious battng they don't get anywhere near the full benefit of their technique, the benefit of the extra levels of technique above the batting skill drops off quickly . Similarly if they had great batting but terrible technique they would waste a fair bit of their batting skill, they'd be erratic etc. The same principles apply to bowling & technique, keeping & technique and so on.
Pretty sure when you get your team and when you pull players, the training they're set to is entirely random. They haven't actually been being trained as those things before you got the team.
Hmm. I'd rather play someone more my level.
Could play my worst players, tbf.
Would be better than my best players, tbf.
What should I am for, that are cheap?
If you're choosing for your senior squad probably reasonable for primary skill then ordinary-avg for technique. Endurance shouldn't be lower than poor if possible.
