Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Carse is arse.EWS tasting it harder than Spikey right now re: Carse.
Carse is arse.EWS tasting it harder than Spikey right now re: Carse.
Your face is arse.Carse is arse.
Not unlike your posts and your third seamer.Your face is arse.
You're tasting it.Carse is arse.
It's strange. You would think he must have felt vindicated and on top of the world after his bowlers put in that performance but he showed up timid as heck instead. No comparison obv, but can you imagine Kohli in his pomp coming out in any frame of mind other than insufferably confident?Gill looked nervous and edgy when he was batting.
Maybe that's what he meant all along.You're tasting it.
It isn't. While Hawk Eye is reliable, it does not exactly simulate the real time variables such as the uneven bounce and wind speed. It is here where an umpire's judgement should take precedence.Also, umpire's call for lbw decisions is an abomination, and I can't believe it hasn't been shelved already.
I would have thought the same if Shubhman Gill remained not out, adding to this now Carse has suddenly found his rhythm and Stokes is going to bowl out of his skins. Not to forget that Archer will be itching to correct his mistakes and at his pace on this uneven pitch won't be easy.You're effectively 58-3 at the moment, chasing a small total, you are already 60-40
Ian Ward is a terrible commentator and host. Dislike his disparaging tone. He himself was a failure, barely played any tests, but you got to listen to the way he conducts himself talking to current cricketers as well as former greats of the game. Maintains this derogatory attitude. Very hard to listen to him; he ruins the whole experience of listening to Atherton Hussain etc.Sundar is a superstar. Made for this level of cricket you can see it from the interview. Really gave it to Smiley Ian Ward.
Bullshit. Hawkeye captures all the camera visible information of how the ball travels until it strikes the batsman, and predicts the remaining path accordingly. It does so drastically more accurately and consistently than any human ump can. That inclues whatever variable bounce or wind effect on the ball, because Hawkeye literally sees it (and with a more holistic visual context incorporating 3 dimensions compared to single view of human).It isn't. While Hawk Eye is reliable, it does not exactly simulate the real time variables such as the uneven bounce and wind speed. It is here where an umpire's judgement should take precedence.
You don't think this equally applies to the hosts? India should still be favourites here. Fourth innings chases shouldn't be easy but they need one decent partnership. If they lose a couple early though, they'll really struggle. Pant is the obviously the key. If he bats for 90 minutes or so tomorrow the game will nearly be done.This is the problem with India's batting. They have looked good mainly due to the lack of seam and swing this series. The moment it starts to move around, they're in trouble
I don't think Hawkeye extrapolates for lateral movement in the air that may or may not occur after the ball hits the pad. There was one LBW where Wagner sent down a banana that was clearly swinging back to hit leg-stump, but not accounting for any swing after impact Hawkeye overruled the on-field out decision.Bullshit. Hawkeye captures all the camera visible information of how the ball travels until it strikes the batsman, and predicts the remaining path accordingly. It does so drastically more accurately and consistently than any human ump can. That inclues whatever variable bounce or wind effect on the ball, because Hawkeye literally sees it (and with a more holistic visual context incorporating 3 dimensions compared to single view of human).
That's the reason that we grade the umps compared to how often their answers correspond to Hawkeye and not the other way around.
Gary Gilmour.Is Gus in your Title : Gus Atkison or Gustavo Fring ?