subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yeah I need 300 wickets for my ATG clubLolwut
Yeah I need 300 wickets for my ATG clubLolwut
so Bumrah and Lindwall aren't ATGs?Yeah I need 300 wickets for my ATG club
Why not 293? or 369?Yeah I need 300 wickets for my ATG club
Round number.Why not 293? or 369?
Lindwall yes because of era. Bumrah not yet to me.so Bumrah and Lindwall aren't ATGs?
Holding and Garner?Yeah I need 300 wickets for my ATG club
Neither ATGs for me. Borderline.Holding and Garner?
I can't think of any of the era who would rate Garner better.anyway, Garner is better.
Nah.Davidson?
They are wrong.I can't think of any of the era who would rate Garner better.
How many total ATG bowlers do you have then?Neither ATGs for me. Borderline.
Bowlers? Around a dozen or so.How many total ATG bowlers do you have then?
Marshall, McGrath, Hadlee, Steyn, Imran, Ambrose, Lillee, Donald, Lindwall, Trueman, Warne and Murali?Bowlers? Around a dozen or so.
It shouldn't be a hard cutoff like that. I'll admit I've been guilty of it myself (sometimes miss Davidson if a filter of 200 wickets doesn't catch him for something statistical). But you can downgrade someone for lack of longevity while also acknowledging that they had a high degree of quality and success.Yeah I need 300 wickets for my ATG club
I want ATGs to be a small clubIt shouldn't be a hard cutoff like that. I'll admit I've been guilty of it myself (sometimes miss Davidson if a filter of 200 wickets doesn't catch him for something statistical). But you can downgrade someone for lack of longevity while also acknowledging that they had a high degree of quality and success.
Yes the three spinners. And Akram.Marshall, McGrath, Hadlee, Steyn, Imran, Ambrose, Lillee, Donald, Lindwall, Trueman, Warne and Murali?
And O'Reilly?