Johan
Hall of Fame Member
Why not RabadaI think I may add Cummins too.
Why not RabadaI think I may add Cummins too.
Adding Cummins and Rabada but not Bumrah just feels..... UghhWhy not Rabada
Are there 10-12 Test bowlers in your ATG club?I want ATGs to be a small club
Garner is better quality wise than half of this list.Marshall, McGrath, Hadlee, Steyn, Imran, Ambrose, Lillee, Donald, Lindwall, Trueman, Warne and Murali?
And O'Reilly?
We finally agree 100% on somethingMy ATG bowlers, chronologically
Sydney Barnes
Bill O'Reilly
Raymond Lindwall
Fred Trueman
Alan Davidson
Dennis Lillee
Michael Holding
Richard Hadlee
Imran Khan
Malcolm Marshall
Joel Garner
Wasim Akram
Curtly Ambrose
Shane Warne
Allan Donald
Glenn McGrath
Muttiah Muralitharan
Dale Steyn
Jasprit Bumrah
I know@shortpitched713 You are blind bruh
Not enough longevity of career sampleGarner is better quality wise than half of this list.
Forgot Barnes. Him too.My ATG bowlers, chronologically
Sydney Barnes
Bill O'Reilly
Raymond Lindwall
Fred Trueman
Alan Davidson
Dennis Lillee
Michael Holding
Richard Hadlee
Imran Khan
Malcolm Marshall
Joel Garner
Wasim Akram
Curtly Ambrose
Shane Warne
Allan Donald
Glenn McGrath
Muttiah Muralitharan
Dale Steyn
Jasprit Bumrah
(technically I’m excluding his very final innings, to show how his career was in 2 seperate stages)Can’t be including Trueman and Lillee while leaving Garner out. Peak Garner was ridiculous.
Floaters are just the shadows of fibrils in your eyes. They are are also a type of variation that Aminul Islam Biplob used to bowl.I know
Edit: Was seeing floaters in the shower last night, so maybe not far off. Probably need to be resting my eyes a bit more.
Garner to me didn't play long enough or take enough wickets.Are there 10-12 Test bowlers in your ATG club?
If so, and it doesn't include Garner than it's not a valid club. 6-7 in the club, and I could understand.
Ambrose. Imran. Holding. Donald.post it.
Lillee should be in the top 10.Ambrose. Imran. Holding. Donald.
Trueman. Lillee. Garner. Akram.
But his cricinfo stats do not read very good.Lillee should be in the top 10.
It's Lillee come on.
That's not true.But his cricinfo stats do not read very good.
I think Lillee’s record is good.That's not true.