• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who are the top 5 Test cricketers of the 1990s and 2000s?

Who are the top 5 Test cricketers of the 1990s and 2000s?


  • Total voters
    22

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
He is not my friend. Nor do I gaf about any of these numbers with small sample sizes for Mcgarh or smith or anyone. Country x, country z. This is modern phenomenon. Peope never did that before. Thats not how players were rated. You have to watch.
I have watched, and both those come from Sachin fans, truly ruined Cricket debating.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Lol no he wasn't, McGrath was literally taking 3WPM @31.

Anyways, at my least you admit this is a blemish on McGraths career.
He was, he has marquee performances, STILL averages 36, means he was **** outside it, it's the basics
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
He was, he has marquee performances, STILL averages 36, means he was **** outside it, it's the basics
I think I prefer that than someone making 30 odd everytime they come to the crease.

But he showed in SA with tougher bowling conditions that he can average well past that which is why I am more forgiving for this blemish than McGraths.

But to be clear it's not my primary argument for why McGrath should be behind Tendulkar.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
I think I prefer that than someone making 30 odd everytime they come to the crease.

But he showed in SA with tougher bowling conditions that he can average well past which is why I am more forgiving for this blemish than McGraths.

But to be clear it's not my primary argument for why McGrath should be behind Tendulkar.
McGrath did well in SA too, and not even on easy pitches, like 630/8 type wickets

another strike
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
not only am I sufficiently old enough to remember Sachin, the fact that you have such a cultish mentality that anyone rating Smith over Sachin in Tests is not credible is truly worrying.

so Okay then, answer, Ponting or Smith? let's see your credibility.
Old enough to remember old sachin, the 2011/12 version? Thanks. Sachin pre 2003/04 vs Sachin post 2003 are two different players. If you have not actually watched pre 2003/04, there is no reason to discuss all this. We are all silly that we discuss players we have not even watched. It's frankly delusional.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Old enough to remember old sachin, the 2011/12 version? Thanks. Sachin pre 2003/04 vs Sachin post 2003 are two different players. If you have not actually watched pre 2003/04, there is no reason to discuss all this. We are all silly that we discuss players we have not even watched. It's frankly delusional.
Yes. I saw Tendulkar at the late 90s as well, I'd rather watch him than Smith anyday, but Smith's results are barely if different at all, and that's all that actually matters.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
McGrath did well in SA too, and not even on easy pitches, like 630/8 type wickets

another strike
I agree McGrath did well in SA, there were some easy pitches and others flatter though he had scoreboard pressure. I think the surfaces in Aus were slightly tougher and this was the best batting lineup he faced at home
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
I agree McGrath did well in SA, there were some easy pitches and others flatter though he had scoreboard pressure. I think the surfaces in Aus were slightly tougher and this was the best batting lineup he faced at home
Scoreboard preassure now?
 

Top