• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ashwin vs Swann, who is better on flat pitches?

Who is the better bowler on flat pitches?


  • Total voters
    34

sayon basak

International Coach
At its peak, both are comparable. Ashwin wasn't at his peak pre-2016. Compare his SENA stats since 2018.
SENA stats of r.ashwin since 2018:-
In Eng:- 5 matches, 15 wickets @27
In AUS:- 4 matches, 18 wickets @27.5
In NZ:- 1 match, 3 wickets @33
In SA:- 6 matches, 11 wickets @39.81
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Usual Horses*hit. This is touring spinners in Sri Lanka where the quality of pitches have not changed much.

View attachment 41556

Pace bowlers

View attachment 41557

Not much of a change in stats hence showing DRS helping spinners is a horsehit theory.
Spinners averages 10 runs less between 2010s and 2000s...... Ofcourse there are other factors like Sri Lankan batting in the 2000s being generally much stronger, but like, this stat if anything proves his point more than yours.
 

govinda indian fan

International Regular
Plenty of Asian spinners are more competitive than Ashwin in SENA though, he is an especially handicapped case compared to an actual all-round spinner like Swann.

I would take Murali, Saqlain, Mushtaq Ahmed, Kumble, Kaneria, Ajmal, Herath and Chandra over Ashwin in SENA.
But ajmal is proven chucker no matter how good he is chucker should never be rated above geniune spinner
 

Xix2565

International Regular
Usual Horses*hit. This is touring spinners in Sri Lanka where the quality of pitches have not changed much.

View attachment 41556

Pace bowlers

View attachment 41557

Not much of a change in stats hence showing DRS helping spinners is a horsehit theory.
So the drop in averages for spinners is what, magic? Or is it now the dumb idea that skillsets magically regress across generations without any consideration for outside factors?

Like ffs, Ashwin literally tweeted about this when discussing a recent Duleep Trophy dismissal. Gtfo with this DRS didn't change anything nonsense
 

Migara

International Coach
So the drop in averages for spinners is what, magic? Or is it now the dumb idea that skillsets magically regress across generations without any consideration for outside factors?

Like ffs, Ashwin literally tweeted about this when discussing a recent Duleep Trophy dismissal. Gtfo with this DRS didn't change anything nonsense
Drop of spinners averages co-incides with that of pacers. Either we have to assume that batsmen have regressed or DRS helps BOTH fast and spin bowlers. You can take your pick.
 

Xix2565

International Regular
Drop of spinners averages co-incides with that of pacers. Either we have to assume that batsmen have regressed or DRS helps BOTH fast and spin bowlers. You can take your pick.
DRS obviously helps bowlers of both types more than it hurts them, and that affects the way people have to play them now. That doesn't imply regression, it suggests adaptation. It's a different game now, and to suggest that it means that batting has somehow regressed is idiotic.
 

Migara

International Coach
If any one suggests that any of the batsmen today are as good as Shewag or Sidhu they are living under a rock.
 

Xix2565

International Regular
If any one suggests that any of the batsmen today are as good as Shewag or Sidhu they are living under a rock.
Sehwag and Sidhu are not the stereotypical batter though, and even then they'd have some issues nowadays. Again, stop making dumbass arguments.
 

Top