SENA stats of r.ashwin since 2018:-At its peak, both are comparable. Ashwin wasn't at his peak pre-2016. Compare his SENA stats since 2018.
Spinners averages 10 runs less between 2010s and 2000s...... Ofcourse there are other factors like Sri Lankan batting in the 2000s being generally much stronger, but like, this stat if anything proves his point more than yours.Usual Horses*hit. This is touring spinners in Sri Lanka where the quality of pitches have not changed much.
View attachment 41556
Pace bowlers
View attachment 41557
Not much of a change in stats hence showing DRS helping spinners is a horsehit theory.
But ajmal is proven chucker no matter how good he is chucker should never be rated above geniune spinnerPlenty of Asian spinners are more competitive than Ashwin in SENA though, he is an especially handicapped case compared to an actual all-round spinner like Swann.
I would take Murali, Saqlain, Mushtaq Ahmed, Kumble, Kaneria, Ajmal, Herath and Chandra over Ashwin in SENA.
That's so racist! Chuckers are also humans. Their lives matter too!But ajmal is proven chucker no matter how good he is chucker should never be rated above geniune spinner
Yes but it is aginst the spirit of gameThat's so racist! Chuckers are also humans. Their lives matter too!
But your comment is against humanity!!! #chuckerwicketsmattersYes but it is aginst the spirit of game
Chill man.....just joking (or am I?)Yes but it is aginst the spirit of game
So the drop in averages for spinners is what, magic? Or is it now the dumb idea that skillsets magically regress across generations without any consideration for outside factors?Usual Horses*hit. This is touring spinners in Sri Lanka where the quality of pitches have not changed much.
View attachment 41556
Pace bowlers
View attachment 41557
Not much of a change in stats hence showing DRS helping spinners is a horsehit theory.
Drop of spinners averages co-incides with that of pacers. Either we have to assume that batsmen have regressed or DRS helps BOTH fast and spin bowlers. You can take your pick.So the drop in averages for spinners is what, magic? Or is it now the dumb idea that skillsets magically regress across generations without any consideration for outside factors?
Like ffs, Ashwin literally tweeted about this when discussing a recent Duleep Trophy dismissal. Gtfo with this DRS didn't change anything nonsense
DRS obviously helps bowlers of both types more than it hurts them, and that affects the way people have to play them now. That doesn't imply regression, it suggests adaptation. It's a different game now, and to suggest that it means that batting has somehow regressed is idiotic.Drop of spinners averages co-incides with that of pacers. Either we have to assume that batsmen have regressed or DRS helps BOTH fast and spin bowlers. You can take your pick.
Sehwag and Sidhu are not the stereotypical batter though, and even then they'd have some issues nowadays. Again, stop making dumbass arguments.If any one suggests that any of the batsmen today are as good as Shewag or Sidhu they are living under a rock.
Dumbass arguments . . . Look at at mirrorSehwag and Sidhu are not the stereotypical batter though, and even then they'd have some issues nowadays. Again, stop making dumbass arguments.
You're the one who started with the idiotic idea.Dumbass arguments . . . Look at at mirror
Now?Ashwin. He'd at least hang around until the series was finished.
AshswannNow?
Still Ashwin. Can't take a bowler who played for only 5 years seriously. Practically played all of his matches in his prime, if he had any.Now?
Looks like I'm not the only jinxer.Ashwin. He'd at least hang around until the series was finished.