• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

3rd Test at the SCG, Sydney, 7 Jan - 11 Jan 2021

TimAngas

State Vice-Captain
The good news for Australia is their bowlers are still (superficially) fit. Back in 2012/13 the du Plessis innings literally rubbed out the entire pace attack (Siddle, Hilfenhaus, Pattinson) from the next test. So in that sense there's a clear distinction to that series, where South Africa absolutely crushed Australia in the decider. Hope I haven't jinxed it.
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I recall someone criticised me for bagging out Smith for blocking endlessly. I don't understand what the difference between before lunch and after lunch when he came out attacking was.
My theory was Australia wanted to survive until lunch and then go for it. But yes, given how comfortable Smith attacking looked after lunch he could've afforded to be more proactive.

Even so 130 overs is plenty of time to bowl someone out.
 

ajdude

International Coach
The good news for Australia is their bowlers are still (superficially) fit. Back in 2012/13 the du Plessis innings literally rubbed out the entire pace attack (Siddle, Hilfenhaus, Pattinson) from the next test. So in that sense there's a clear distinction to that series, where South Africa absolutely crushed Australia in the decider. Hope I haven't jinxed it.
lucky our next in is neser and not john hastings
 

Spark

Global Moderator
so i tried turning on SEN radio and the first thing i hear is brad haddin calling vihari "rahane"
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
My theory was Australia wanted to survive until lunch and then go for it. But yes, given how comfortable Smith attacking looked after lunch he could've afforded to be more proactive.

Even so 130 overs is plenty of time to bowl someone out.
Yeah they created plenty enough chances to win tbh.
 

Top