Mr Miyagi
Banned
But was he a captain, mate?Bhardwaj averaged 9 with the bat and 107 with the ball, mate
But was he a captain, mate?Bhardwaj averaged 9 with the bat and 107 with the ball, mate
Haha, looks like the thinker in the gates of hell.And it's not even the stats, he just didn't look like a cricketer at all. It honestly looked as if a random clerk from a local bank had been called up to play cricket. Look at him ffs.
Nah Fatel still visually looked like he could cope with the game at the highest level on occasion.Samit Patel, 16.77 with the bat, 60.14 with the ball
Samit Patel | England Cricket | Cricket Players and Officials | ESPNcricinfo
Wow that's poor with the ball.I give you James Franklin the converted true batting allrounder. 10 tests for an average of 18 with the bat and 107 with the ball.
All-round records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo
Fair point cricaddict, but, I'm leaving "worst" everyone's wide interpretation and discretion so everyone can have a say, be it comparative to team or absolute. By top - I just mean primarily to avoid the battling minnows, where the guy may have been a stronger player in a team that just happened to be weak and getting established, like I appreciate noone has said Mohammad Ashrahful as yet.Miyagi, I think you should define 'Worst' and 'Top' by a cut-off. Then, you can get specific players.
Chandana?At least other sides had a person to be called worst. SL hadn't had any at test level Closest was Ravi Ratnayeke 26 with bat and 36 with ball.
In ODIs Sachith PAthirana and Sekkuige Ptrasanna takes the crown.
Legspinner who could bat. He, Dharmasena and Ruwan Kalpage punched well above their weights (which were slight) with the bat, and Vaas too.Chandana?
bowling average of 41 thoughLegspinner who could bat. He, Dharmasena and Ruwan Kalpage punched well above their weights (which were slight) with the bat, and Vaas too.
Chandana was an ODI bowler. He, Dharmasena and Kalpage was expected to keep the runs down while Murali takes the wickets in ODIs. All three did not play much tests. They were called "all rounders" because SL did not have any except Jayasuriya in ODIs. And Sl FCC is ****. Dharmasena has 12 odd centuries and averages 30+ with bat.bowling average of 41 though
Batting average of 26. The same batting stats as they guy you named as the worst all rounder except worse bowling. I dunno I always saw him as an all-rounder, I mean he averaged 30 in FC cricket with 8 centuries. If that's not an all-rounder then very few players are.
Dunno man. You call Ravi Ratnayeke (with a FC average of 28 and 1 hundred) an all-rounder but not Chandana with a FC average over 30 and 8 hundreds? I'd defer to your clearly superior knowledge of Sri Lankan cricket but those classifications just don't make sense.Chandana was an ODI bowler. He, Dharmasena and Kalpage was expected to keep the runs down while Murali takes the wickets in ODIs. All three did not play much tests. They were called "all rounders" because SL did not have any except Jayasuriya in ODIs. And Sl FCC is ****. Dharmasena has 12 odd centuries and averages 30+ with bat.