Kohli scored two centuries in the very first Test of that series. Even if it had been just a non-big 3 two test series, he'd still have scored twice as many centuries against Australia in the one series than Sangakkara has in his entire career It's not like he's needing to get his eye in and scoring all his centuries at the fag end of Test series'.i've got no issues with bowling attacks. i cbf looking up who sangakkara faced because im sick and i cbf anyway but kohli doing what he did in the wake of 5-0 ashes is the goods. if i was going to hammer on kohli i'd choose his english series and point out his nz 100 was pointless and in a relatively easy situation.
someone with more ability to care to look up how often sangakkara had the gloves while facing aussie.
i would still argue the big three thing makes the gap a lot wider than it seems (kohli's hot streak down under being a case in point of getting a roll on - sangakkara may have scored multiple tons as well if his hobart knock was in a 4-5 test series) but kohli being a better player of pure pace and bounce (not movement) is a decent argument. not one that im yet convinced by but now we've stopped being ****s to each other i may be willing to meet you in the middle. 51-49 to me
they don't though. this is why "kane williams" and "sangakkara the wicketkeeper test opener in a 2014 world XI for C9" are a thingThe big 3 argument is a load of drivel. If you are good enough, people will notice regardless of which team you play for.
was probably a road, FCA and FTB. crap attack. it can't even beat england now.Kohli scored two centuries in the very first Test of that series. Even if it had been just a non-big 3 two test series, he'd still have scored twice as many centuries against Australia in the one series than Sangakkara has in his entire career It's not like he's coming in and scoring all his centuries at the fag end of Test series'.
That's the general public though. Most here on CW follow every test series. Maybe not as dedicatedly as a series involving their own country but you have people from every nation posting in match threads and presumably watching the match being played by two other countries. And even here, most do rate Kallis and Sanga a smidgen below Tendulkar and Lara. You can't really explain that.they don't though. this is why "kane williams" and "sangakkara the wicketkeeper test opener in a 2014 world XI for C9" are a thing
this forum is basically one big australia-nz-england-india love/hate in though and the talk (understandably) usually follows those teams by a long way. we have like three sri lankans - a computer, an australian and a **** respectively.That's the general public though. Most here on CW follow every test series. Maybe not as dedicatedly as a series involving their own country but you have people from every nation posting in match threads and presumably watching the match being played by two other countries. And even here, most do rate Kallis and Sanga a smidgen below Tendulkar and Lara. You can't really explain that.
Rubbish we have like 719 of those little NZers.this forum is basically one big australia-nz-england-india love/hate in though. we have like three sri lankans - a computer, an australian and a **** respectively.
that's why i said we're one big australia-nz-england-india love/hate in tbhRubbish we have like 719 of those little NZers.
There is absolutely no doubt that Kohli is an inferior player ofIf we are so keen on comparing Kohli/Sanga vs Australia without context, how about we also compare Kohli/Sanga in England? Kohli averages what 20 in England?
looking at sanga's pretty but slightly up himself face vs kohli's trying to hard to be edgy and city suave face this is close tbhThere is absolutely no doubt that Kohli is an inferior player
The whole post was full of drivel but I wanted a crack at this part in particular. Kohli faced about 20 balls in the entire series, the only thing he got a good look at was the dressing rooms.same goes for regularity - even though kohli flopped in england he'll get another extended crack in two minutes and he had a good look at english conditions through those 4 tests.
being ruthlessly exposed over a longer period gives you more of a trend to look at than "oh i nicked off 3 or 4 times, oh well, i'll have to work on that for our next series in four years time"The whole post was full of drivel but I wanted a crack at this part in particular. Kohli faced about 20 balls in the entire series, the only thing he got a good look at was the dressing rooms.
It's a theory that's got more validity than whatever Phlegm is talking about.I propose that the reason why Kohli's record suffers unfairly is because being a big 3 nation player, he's exposed to more Tests in England which drags down his record.
Kohli was never at the crease long enough to notice the conditions never mind work them out.being ruthlessly exposed over a longer period gives you more of a trend to look at than "oh i nicked off 3 or 4 times, oh well, i'll have to work on that for our next series in four years time"