I thought it was arsehole.Asshole isn't filtered. And if it was, it'd be ******* not a**hole, never mind a***hole.
tbh i dont careAsshole isn't filtered. And if it was, it'd be ******* not a**hole, never mind a***hole.
Avoiding the filter is a sin.tbh i dont care
Unlikely, Wimbledon finishes on Sunday.Not saying commentary in SA is any better, as it most certainly isn't.. But in the TMS box he is outclassed by everyone except this hideous Pougatch character, who I now see is covering Wimbledon.. Lets hope he stays there for the SA series..
You really think so ???Except Ramiz Raja there is no good Asian commentator.
I agree. I’ve never really liked him. Sure, as a kid, I thought that he was interesting and eccentric. But now he comes across as amateurish and tiresome.No he can't.. A good commentator paints a picture of what's going on whilst consistently getting player names/scores/details correct.
I'm afraid Blofeld falls well short, sure he is a cracking guy, who just needs to grab his pipe and slipper now I think
You are right.I agree. I’ve never really liked him. Sure, as a kid, I thought that he was interesting and eccentric. But now he comes across as amateurish and tiresome.
Neither a respected cricketing journalist or an ex-player. Just a character. That gets boring quickly.
He isn’t what I want representing cricket when new people tune in. Its a 21st century professional sport not a boarding school arse tickling competition.
He is a clown. I don't find him funny, though, I just find him irritating. In fact I think he's an imbecile.And yeah how can anyone not like "David Lloyd" eh?
He is the ultimate commentary-box poser. I don't mean in terms of his natty dress sense, I mean in terms of his smug self-satisfaction in his commentary. The content of what he's saying is actually relatively perceptive and thoughtful. But his operatic delivery and his oh-so affected language make him the ultimate ponce among pundits.And, whats that abt Mark Nicholas which some people dont like?
Oho! Spot on and my sentiments exactly. Another terrible Nicholas one-word response to a good shot is the perennially annoying, "CRACKERJACK!!"He is the ultimate commentary-box poser. I don't mean in terms of his natty dress sense, I mean in terms of his smug self-satisfaction in his commentary. The content of what he's saying is actually relatively perceptive and thoughtful. But his operatic delivery and his oh-so affected language make him the ultimate ponce among pundits.
"Sixer!"
"HO HO Freddie!"
"By heaven!"
As I may have mentioned already on this thread, someone once summed it up brilliantly by saying that Nicholas is "laminated in a veneer of self-regard".
His drooling over the skills and muscles of the Australian team is also more than a little embarrassing.
Agree with all of that. And Langers' post that you were replying to.I agree. I’ve never really liked him (Henry Blofeld). Sure, as a kid, I thought that he was interesting and eccentric. But now he comes across as amateurish and tiresome.
Neither a respected cricketing journalist or an ex-player. Just a character. That gets boring quickly.
He isn’t what I want representing cricket when new people tune in. Its a 21st century professional sport not a boarding school arse tickling competition.
Read any of his books?Neither a respected cricketing journalist or an ex-player. Just a character. That gets boring quickly.
I do not think that he strives intentionally to sound like a toff; indeed, he made a quite startling admission in a Channel 4 interview five years ago: "Noh, old bean, I ne'ah listen to recordings of my ohwn commentaarrry: I have alwass struck myself as sounding rahthah like ah pompous prat!"Nowadays, he strikes me as mostly interested in perpetuating his own self-imporance
What new avatar?Rodders, what on Earth is that new avatar?
Yeah. What new Avatar RichardWhat new avatar?