SJS
Hall of Fame Member
Oh yes they are and they give you 'some' idea of a players caliber particularly against his peers. But thats about it.Stats are fun, but they also carry meaning. I've always said that there is no single criteria for judging how good a player is, but an accumulation of many relevant points that will decide the better player.
Any of us who has played enough cricket against quality opposition will know that the best of his performances are not all those which appear the best in statistical terms. So to that extent there is always the risk attached when looking purely at stats to compare players, particularly of different eras, I hasten to add.
This is all we need to keep in mind when raving and ranting about any sets of stats. They have just 'so much' utility. If you want more, you have to rely on the accounts of those who played against, with or at least watched these greats.
Rest is all for the pubs and over a pint or two of beer as has been suggested so wisely.