Flem274*
123/5
Bit of an aside but this isn't the case. I can think of several players from New Zealand alone who were late bloomers. I can also name you a couple of schoolboy prodigies who, looking at them in retrospect, would make you scratch your head.When I was at the age from which it's possible to develop into a good cricket player (no later than 14, IMO)
Two names: Craig Cumming and Shane Bond - guess which categories they fall into?
I don't dispute starting earlier is best because it takes so much to make it to test or even FC cricket - you need to learn what works, apply it to yourself and see what works for you and then get so good at it those skills are ingrained instincts - but latecomers can do it, it's just harder.