Swann > Ajmal for me. Swann is successful all around the globe and has a good record in SA too.
Twenty-over cricket can be “boring”. It has grown up. It takes concentration. It is no longer a game for the post-literate generation. They need the distractions, the loud music to disguise the boredom. They never warned you about that.
Steyn, Philander, Anderson, Lyon
It picks itself. I'm surprised some people are actually opting for Swann ahead of Ajmal.
Ajmal's past 20 Tests he's taken 115 wickets at 24.
Swann's past 20 Test he's taken 77 wickets at 32.
Ajmal has leapfrogged him massively.
On turning track
Herath deserves to be picked more than Swann on recent performances.
Steyn and Philander are obvious choices. So is Ajmal, on recent form. Anderson would have to be third pacer imo, non of our boys have been good enough and/or consistent enough.
BTW, I think you guys are seriously overrating Watson.
he doesn't bowl anymore though.
Has he actually received professional medical opinion that he shouldn't bowl anymore or is he just a ****?
I don't think he exactly needed a professional opinion, the correlation was pretty obvious.
Exit pursuing a beer
For me the best attack is
Didn't Roach have the best strike rate of any pacer last year? so clearly he's the real deal and his performances against Australia and NZ proved that imo, plus he done well in England despite being injured.
One Day cups- Champions trophy winners-T20 cup-29 test series without defeat record- and some think we're a "minnow".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)