Go Back   Cricket Web > Cricket Discussion > Cricket Chat



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


View Poll Results: Who is The Greatest West Indies Batsman of All Time?
Isaac Vivian Alexander "Viv" Richards 13 22.41%
Garfield St Aubrun "Garry" Sobers 17 29.31%
George Alphonso Headley 11 18.97%
Brian Charles Lara 17 29.31%
Voters: 58. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2012, 08:38 PM   #1 (permalink)
U19 Captain
 
harsh.skm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: India
Posts: 661
Who is The Greatest West Indies Batsman of All Time

I always figured that this would be the most difficult question to answer with regards to the Windies. Personally, I think it is a toss up between Sobers and Viv. I never actually got to saw Sobers bat live, but the tales of his awesomeness were part of growing up for me. Everyone thought he was the best left hander ever. Even the emergence of Graeme Pollock and Brian Charles Lara didn't change the mind of any of my elders. Having watched some of his videos, I can see what they meant, but still I cannot understand the fascination as such. It seems to me that Lara was as good, and sometimes better. But I will defer to the opinion of others on Lara v Sobers. When it comes to Viv, so many intangibles apart from his batting come into play that sometimes it's almost a bias to think of him as a better batsman than say, George Headley. But having watched Viv, it would be nigh impossible for me to rank him below the Black Bradman. Opinions?
harsh.skm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 08:50 PM   #2 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Burgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Castle
Posts: 35,161
Sobers or Headley IMO, followed closely by Viv and Lara.
__________________
WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie
"People make me happy.. not places.. people"

"When a man is tired of London, he is tired of life." - Samuel Johnson
"Oh my God, there's a castle! A castle!"
Burgey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 08:50 PM   #3 (permalink)
Dan
Global Moderator
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,107
Sir Frank Worrell

His record is slightly less awesome that some of the others on display (but still in ATG territory), but the intangibles he brought to the table were far more important than Viv's IMO.
Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 09:00 PM   #4 (permalink)
U19 Captain
 
harsh.skm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: India
Posts: 661
Quote:
Originally Posted by rvd619323 View Post
Sir Frank Worrell

His record is slightly less awesome that some of the others on display (but still in ATG territory), but the intangibles he brought to the table were far more important than Viv's IMO.
To be honest, if you were going to pic from the 3Ws, Everton Weekes was a better batsman than Worrell. Sir Garry said so himself. Intangibles of leadership shouldn't really come into this discussion now, should it?
harsh.skm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 09:13 PM   #5 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: The land of Siddle
Posts: 2,876
Felt like Worrell was missing from the list too.
__________________
Oh for a strong arm and a walking stick
Jager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 09:46 PM   #6 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
kyear2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: w.i
Posts: 2,519
To me Walcott was the best of the three W's closely folled by Weekes then comes Worrell.

Back to the title post I think they are all equal. Honestly I was just watching some old Lara innings on Youtube and I find it hard to belive that any batsman was his superior when he was at his best. Sobers was Sobers and his record speaks for it self, but because of his heavy bowling load he batted at 6 for a lot of his career while the others spent more of their careers in the top 4. Viv at his peak in the late 70's- early '80's was the defination of dominance, but he played on too long after he had passed his best and his best was the shortest of all of the others listed, but what he accomplished in that time was enough for him to be named one of Wisdens cricketers of the Century. Lara's biggest problem was Lara and where his mind and motivation was at, and that is where Sachin was his better, consistency. When the war began in '39 Headley was on his was to becoming the best batsman in the World, bar none, he was becoming that dominant. He was also a quick learner, his worse tour also told us the most about the man, especially how he finished off againts Grimmett and Ironmonger. He played only 22 tests but the first 19 were spread over 10 years, it wasn't as if he was given the opportunity to consistently hone his skills againts the best, but at most one series a year and againts much stronger opposition. Unlike Bradman he didn't get to play againts minnows (they were one of the minnows), and only played againts the two strong teams of the time, He didn't have the support strong batting lineup, he was out batting lineup and he played with the pressure that if he got out, more than likely the team would crumble and they would loose. 10 hundreds in 19 tests before the war. He was more attractive than Bradman and supposedly better on sticky wickets. Headley was the first and the one who created the spark of West Indies cricket.
All of them are All Time top 10 batsmen, so hard to pick, but as a pure batsman, by the slimmest of margins Headley.
__________________
1st XI
Hutton | Hobbs | Bradman | Richards | Tendulkar | Sobers | Gilchrist | Khan | Marshall | Warne | McGrath
2nd XI
Sutcliffe | Gavaskar | Headley | Chappell | Lara | Kallis | Miller | Knott | Ambrose | Lillee | Muralitharan
3rd XI
Greenidge | Morris | Ponting | Pollock | Hammond | Worrell | Ames | Hadlee | Holding | Trueman | O'Reilly
4th XI
Richards | Simpson | Sangakkara | Weekes | Border | Walcott | Botham | Lindwall | Laker | Garner | Barnes
kyear2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 10:10 PM   #7 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
smalishah84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: dxb
Posts: 18,865


Would probably be a toss between Sobers and Richards.

I didn't see Sobers play but if there was ever a batsman who could annihilate the opposition it was Viv. He couldn't just score quickly, he could demoralize you.
__________________
And smalishah's avatar is the most classy one by far Jan certainly echoes the sentiments of CW

Yeah we don't crap in the first world; most of us would actually have no idea what that was emanating from Ajmal's backside. Why isn't it roses and rainbows like what happens here? PEWS's retort to Ganeshran on Daemon's picture depicting Ajmal's excreta
smalishah84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 10:22 PM   #8 (permalink)
U19 Captain
 
harsh.skm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: India
Posts: 661
I didn't put any of the 3Ws on the poll for this reason only: They are too close to separate. And I honestly couldn't imagine anyone preferring them to the four listed. So, presumption on my part, I guess.

True the fact about Sobers batting lower down the order. Although he did score 3 centuries batting at number 3 (including the 365), 6 centuries at number 4, and 7 centuries at number 5.

Viv was literally a bowler's nightmare. Headley seems to be as great as anybody, and he apparently was a silky smooth batsman, and very attractive to watch. Lara was, well, Lara.
harsh.skm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 10:27 PM   #9 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
Prince EWS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 37,824
Hard to split Sobers and Headley for me. Richards wouldn't make my top seven or so.
__________________
~ Cribbage
Prince EWS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 10:36 PM   #10 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
kyear2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: w.i
Posts: 2,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prince EWS View Post
Hard to split Sobers and Headley for me. Richards wouldn't make my top seven or so.
Tad harsh towards Viv?
kyear2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 10:52 PM   #11 (permalink)
Request Your Custom Title Now!
 
Jono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Virat Kohli
Posts: 47,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prince EWS View Post
Hard to split Sobers and Headley for me. Richards wouldn't make my top seven or so.
Lol.

Great example of you feeling Viv is overrated and overcompensating in the reverse.
Jono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 10:57 PM   #12 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
Prince EWS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 37,824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jono View Post
Lol.

Great example of you feeling Viv is overrated and overcompensating in the reverse.
Nah, bull****. There's seriously absolutely no reason why I can't claim that Headley, Sobers, Lara, Weekes and Walcott were better than him. Richards was a great batsman but yes I do find him over-rated and there's absolutely no shame in behind those guys; they were absolute legends of the highest order. I did exaggerate slightly (I don't think Kanhai or Worrell were better than him, but it is close) but that puts him 6th and I'm comfortable with that.
Prince EWS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 11:05 PM   #13 (permalink)
International Captain
 
kingkallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: India
Posts: 5,723
Brian Charles Lara
__________________
CricZo XI - Draft League

Season 1 M Hayden, G Gooch, R Dravid, W Hammond, K Pietersen, G Sobers, R Marsh (wk), R Benaud (c), D Steyn, W Hall, N Adcock

Season 2 J Hobbs, B Richards, D Boon, H Taylor, C Lloyd (c), A Stewart (wk), T Goddard, A Davidson, H Tayfield, C Ambrose, H Griffith

Season 3 H Sutcliffe, M Hayden, I Chappell (c), G Pollock, A Faulkner, M Hussey, D Lindsay (wk), I Botham, A Kumble, M Marshall, D Lillee
kingkallis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 11:10 PM   #14 (permalink)
Request Your Custom Title Now!
 
Jono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Virat Kohli
Posts: 47,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prince EWS View Post
Nah, bull****. There's seriously absolutely no reason why I can't claim that Headley, Sobers, Lara, Weekes and Walcott were better than him. Richards was a great batsman but yes I do find him over-rated and there's absolutely no shame in behind those guys; they were absolute legends of the highest order. I did exaggerate slightly (I don't think Kanhai or Worrell were better than him, but it is close) but that puts him 6th and I'm comfortable with that.
So you did overcompensate by having him 8th then? You agree?

In any case, why is Weekes better than him?
Jono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2012, 11:12 PM   #15 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
Prince EWS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 37,824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jono View Post
So you did overcompensate by having him 8th then? You agree?

In any case, why is Weekes better than him?
I didn't overcompensate; I exaggerated. There's a difference.

I actually said "top seven" because if I picked two openers in a batting lineup, he wouldn't make the batting lineup. But I do rate him higher than all the opening options.
Prince EWS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
**Official** New Zealand in West Indies James Cricket Chat 1677 07-08-2012 10:35 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web