Well, he's back, and I'm sure I am one of many posters on here that think the cricket world is a better place because of it.
My two questions are, 1) can he be as good a bowler and effective a wicket-taker as before?; and
2) With a strike-rate of 27, an E/R of 4.18 in this day and age, and an average of 19, do you think he is a candidate to named as the Greatest ODI bowler of all time? He has nearly played 70 matches, so I don't think you can play the "not a big enough sample" card.