Turbinator said:I really love these new members, they remind me of myself.
silentstriker said:Murali if his arm was straight, Warne otherwise.
Langeveldt said:To be fair, new members shouldn't have to wade through the entire forums history and get some sort of education about how things have been discussed etc in order not to piss us off.
I agree, and extend that to anyone that didn't vote Dave Mohammed.Turbinator said:Those of you who said Murali, I want to know why.
I just explained why in the post above, even though I said Warne.steds said:I agree, and extend that to anyone that didn't vote Dave Mohammed.
SS what do you think about Bhajji and Kumble?silentstriker said:Murali outperforms Warne in virtually every measurable category. There is no way an unbiased person could claim that Warne is better than Murali, except if they prefer one over the other. Murali has a better economy rate, a better average, a better strike rate, more wickets per test, more five fors and more ten fors (even while playing less tests). For example, Murali has played like 35 less tests than Warne, yet still has about 20 more five-fors, and 8 more ten-fors.
However, it all boils down to the action, as always.
They are spinners that play for India.Turbinator said:SS what do you think about Bhajji and Kumble?