Turbinator
Cricketer Of The Year
o ofcourse not i wudnt be biased liek that.......R_D said:of course it has nothing to do with the fact that he's indian rite ?
o ofcourse not i wudnt be biased liek that.......R_D said:of course it has nothing to do with the fact that he's indian rite ?
I suppose you are right. Scoring less at a lower average at a lower speed with a smaller conversion clearly points to him being a better batsman.JBH001 said:Because Anwar was the better batsman (so far) and people recognised that.
hey aussie tragic. i guess anwar should go through as you suggest since he has garnered more votes. however, it is a personal disappointment since i would have preferred gooch, sehwag and smith ahead of him. but well, more forum members prefer anwar. so lets go for it.aussie tragic said:Subject to Bagapath's confirmation, (as he is the thread starter) I consider that Anwar should go through based on a count back of all votes between the two Opener Polls.
This count back system will also work well on the new approach decided on the main thread (i.e. we'll have a prelimanary Poll whereby the top 4 will go into a selection Poll; If the selection Poll is then tied, whoever got the most votes in the preliminary Poll will be declared the winner)
btw, Hayden is locked in as the # 1 Opener by a landslide margin and there's no way he should have to go back into a three-way vote with Anwar & Sehwag as suggested by some
Ok firstly how do you know all the Pakistanis voted for Anwar? Secondly what you call bias might be considered patriotism by some .Perry Mason said:Personally I think thats a poor decision to award it to Anwar based on the results of the first poll. I've gone through that thread now, and it seems to me that almost all the Indians on that thread favoured Hayden as the #1 opener, while the Pakistanis (I assume from their other posts on the forum) were in favour of Anwar. It was only when Hayden was removed from the equation that the Indians shifted allegiance to Sehwag. Which suggests bias on the part of the Pakistanis in the poll for the #1 opener to me.
I went by those who posted their comments in the thread. And if patriotism/bias (tomatoe-tomatoh) are to be factors in an exercise as this, its a futile exercise.StumpMic said:Ok firstly how do you know all the Pakistanis voted for Anwar? Secondly what you call bias might be considered patriotism by some .
Can I suggest that this team has 2 spinners in it please...Fusion said:GASP, the
spinner(s)! This may go on for a year or so!
Because he's also had far more batsman friendly conditions and faced overall weaker bowling.silentstriker said:Sehwag scores more runs at a faster rate, a better average and with more centuries and a phenomenal conversion rate. Why is this poll tied?
Nah, to avoid the future arguments I propose Warne opens the batting.Jono said:I reckon Anwar and Sehwag should be disqualified and Gooch should slot in.
that was always the plan marc. please see the original thread "Playing selector: Lets pick the best test XI of the past two decades"marc71178 said:Can I suggest that this team has 2 spinners in it please...
marc71178 said:Because he's also had far more batsman friendly conditions and faced overall weaker bowling.