Think I preferred it when Trott got to 40 quickly before getting out.
Booo.
63*
Yeah good decision that is. That's the thing with Starc, always the threat of getting it in the perfect area even when he isn't bowling well. Australia have a big chance here, lucky tea is only 5 minutes away.
Originally Posted by Uppercut
cw at its finest
+ time's fickle card game ~ with you and i +
forever 63*
Trott more shocked that Starc bowled one in the vague vicinity of the stumps with the new ball than anything.
Edit: Ah yes fair, second new ball.
Last edited by MW1304; 23-08-2013 at 10:05 AM.
might go to bed now, hope to see the 4th wicket fall when i get home from work tomorrow night
Don't know why it was reviewed and not sure why it took so long to give. Painful innings from Trott.
Don't let Woakesy get exposed to the new ball
RIP Philip Hughes - 1988-2014
Cricketing logic being applied here. Why don't England send a nightwatchman out here? Why is the end of the day different from the end of session? Break in play is a break in play no?
oh this is juicy
Moved down to Reading from Stockport about four weeks ago. Love and all that.
"Shane Warne loves me more"
"No he loves me more"
Indians can't bowl - Where has the rumour come from as I myself and many indian friends arwe competent fast bowlers ?
With the English bid I said: Let us be brief. If you give back the Falkland Islands, which belong to us, you will get my vote. They then became sad and left
Why do people suddenly not know about the Starc second new ball thing?
~ Cribbertarian ~
Rejecting 'analysis by checklist' and 'skill absolutism' since Dec '09
Fixed.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
308Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
