Lets hypothetically say your country has the best fielder the game of cricket has ever seen. He is incredibly athletic with lighting fast reflexes, stopping boundaries with his Usain Bolt like pace while possessing the talent to catch any half chances within the infield or outfield. He is also deadly accurate in the field; hitting the stumps from anywhere of the ground 9 times out of 10 - including from the boundaries!
However, there is a catch (no pun intended).
Despite being able to field anywhere, he cannot wicket-keep.
And with a high score of 1, his batting makes Chris Martin look superior. His bowling, isn't great either. For some reason, he simply cannot land the ball on the pitch.
In consideration of all the three formats, would he make your XI in place of a genuine batsman, bowler or all-rounder?
However, there is a catch (no pun intended).
Despite being able to field anywhere, he cannot wicket-keep.
And with a high score of 1, his batting makes Chris Martin look superior. His bowling, isn't great either. For some reason, he simply cannot land the ball on the pitch.
In consideration of all the three formats, would he make your XI in place of a genuine batsman, bowler or all-rounder?