Do we really need one for runs? And if we do, should probably be earlier up and can't that be Lords(ish)?Lords for the occasion of the 1st test
Barbados for a pacefest
Sydney (classic) for spin
Durban for testing swing and seam
Calcutta for runs
The fastest wicket in the WI historically and in the world is old Sabina. Carry on...Lords for the occasion of the 1st test
Barbados for a pacefest
Sydney (classic) for spin
Durban for testing swing and seam
Calcutta for runs
True. Sabina Park it is...The fastest wicket in the WI historically and in the world is old Sabina. Carry on...
Didn't that also had some uneven bounce issues at times? I could be wrong.. but fast it wasThe fastest wicket in the WI historically and in the world is old Sabina. Carry on...
I assume the WACA doesn't have the bounce it used to? That would be preferable for Australia, no?Lords for the occasion of the 1st test
Barbados for a pacefest
Sydney (classic) for spin
Durban for testing swing and seam
Calcutta for runs
Umm, but do we?If you want the Spinfest it has to be Galle.
Yes we doUmm, but do we?
It should be fine as long as they dont eat too many rosogollasCalcutta for runs
I think the WACA might like a word hereThe fastest wicket in the WI historically and in the world is old Sabina. Carry on...
Nah Sydney is the embodiment of Lord’s for Australia. The MCG is just a giant fish bowl these days, the WACA deck was awesome in its day but they’ve only played tests there since 1971I assume the WACA doesn't have the bounce it used to? That would be preferable for Australia, no?