govinda indian fan
International Regular
Two of best players of their eras. Who is better
Hasn't this been done like a million times before
I think Hutton and Viv have been more like Root and Kohli the last two yearsThe 1st poll- Viv wins 2:1
The 2nd poll- Equalish
The 3rd poll- Hutton wins 2:1
Shows how both of their reps have changed in the past couple of years on CW
Strike rate is his biggest selling point, I agree.Viv averaged 50 batting at no.3 in a pace friendly era while striking at 70. Don't think anyone is cricket aside from him could achieve that.
It's but one.Strike rate is his biggest selling point, I agree.
Without a helmet tooViv averaged 50 batting at no.3 in a pace friendly era while striking at 70. Don't think anyone is cricket aside from him could achieve that.
I think if Bradman increased his SR to 70 he’d still manage it.Viv averaged 50 batting at no.3 in a pace friendly era while striking at 70. Don't think anyone is cricket aside from him could achieve that.
Bradman is already a separate class but not sure on the SR point.I think if Bradman increased his SR to 70 he’d still manage it.
Viv dominated the individual ATG pacers and allround great (maybe not ATG) attacks like Eng 76 and 81, Aus 79 and Pak 80.Viv dominating ATG pace attacks is the biggest myth about him. The only truly ATG level attack of his era was the one he didn't have to face. Having a good record against Lillee or Hadlee is fine but nothing exceptional when it's just individual ATG pacers and the attack around them is merely decent. The all round quality of the post war Australian attacks Hutton dominated was just better than anything viv faced.
And what outside of that Australian attack? There's nothing apart from that attack.Viv dominating ATG pace attacks is the biggest myth about him. The only truly ATG level attack of his era was the one he didn't have to face. Having a good record against Lillee or Hadlee is fine but nothing exceptional when it's just individual ATG pacers and the attack around them is merely decent. The all round quality of the post war Australian attacks Hutton dominated was just better than anything viv faced.
And the Indian spin quartet.And what outside of that Australian attack? There's nothing apart from that attack.
Not to mention the first half of Hutton's career, actually the majority of his career was played on the deadest of pitches in the history of the game.
I love Hutton, more than most here, but he didn't consistently dominate great attacks more than Viv, no one did.
Qadir gets flack for his away record, as does (relatively) Imran, but despite how it was achieved, there's been very few greater challenge than facing those two in Pakistan during the late 70's into 80's.
Similarly Lillee and Thompson during the late 70's in Australia and Lillee on those drop in green pitches favored for WSC. Lillee and Thompson during that brief period was the most terrifying partnership in cricket up to that point in the game.
Hadlee at home too was no less efficient if obviously less physically threatening. He made NZ a challenge at home if not a full contender.
Peak Botham too was a menace and of course he was paired with Bob Willis.
Viv has a better record against great and ATG bowlers than almost anyone from among the BAB contenders. From memory (from Johan's posts) Sobers comes close, with Tendulkar and Lara being a bit behind. I honestly don't recall what Smith's are.
To say it was just solo acts and not combos, takes both ridiculously out of context.