govinda indian fan
International Regular
Two of best players of their eras. Who is better
Hasn't this been done like a million times before
I think Hutton and Viv have been more like Root and Kohli the last two yearsThe 1st poll- Viv wins 2:1
The 2nd poll- Equalish
The 3rd poll- Hutton wins 2:1
Shows how both of their reps have changed in the past couple of years on CW
Strike rate is his biggest selling point, I agree.Viv averaged 50 batting at no.3 in a pace friendly era while striking at 70. Don't think anyone is cricket aside from him could achieve that.
It's but one.Strike rate is his biggest selling point, I agree.
Without a helmet tooViv averaged 50 batting at no.3 in a pace friendly era while striking at 70. Don't think anyone is cricket aside from him could achieve that.
I think if Bradman increased his SR to 70 he’d still manage it.Viv averaged 50 batting at no.3 in a pace friendly era while striking at 70. Don't think anyone is cricket aside from him could achieve that.
Bradman is already a separate class but not sure on the SR point.I think if Bradman increased his SR to 70 he’d still manage it.
Viv dominated the individual ATG pacers and allround great (maybe not ATG) attacks like Eng 76 and 81, Aus 79 and Pak 80.Viv dominating ATG pace attacks is the biggest myth about him. The only truly ATG level attack of his era was the one he didn't have to face. Having a good record against Lillee or Hadlee is fine but nothing exceptional when it's just individual ATG pacers and the attack around them is merely decent. The all round quality of the post war Australian attacks Hutton dominated was just better than anything viv faced.