• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Top Batsmen with 20 or Fewer Tests

Line and Length

Cricketer Of The Year
The history of Test cricket is littered with players who played 20 or fewer Tests yet whose batting averages suggested they warranted longer careers. There are several possible reasons why many of these players didn’t receive more opportunities. Injuries, bans, intervention of wars and the presence of established, well performed batsmen are all factors.

If we begin with a qualification of a batting average on excess of 45 there is a significant number of players in the list. Given that averages can be skewed by one innings, I have overlooked players who played in just a one-off test. In many cases, a check of the player’s first class career stats gives evidence as to why their Test careers were limited. From that perspective I have put a qualification that the player should have a first class batting average in excess of 40. Finally, I haven’t included players who are currently playing at a first class level.

Having imposed these restrictions I am left with 25 names (actually 24, but I couldn’t resist putting in the final candidate). In order of Test batting average they are presented below, together with their first class batting average. Members might like to suggest a batting order for the 6 players they see as the “best of” in the list. Please let me know if I have overlooked any player that should be included.

PlayerTestsTest BattingFirst Class Batting
Barry Richards4508 @ 72.5728,358 @ 54.74
Stewie Dempster10723 @ 65.7212,145 @ 44.98
Sid Barnes131,072 @ 63.058,333 @ 54.11
Eddie Paynter201,540 @ 59.2320,075 @ 42.26
K.S.Duleepsinhji12995 @ 58.5215,485 @ 49.96
Ken Weekes2173 @ 57.661,731 @ 40.25
Jack Russell10910 @ 56.8727,354 @ 41.57
Brad Hodge6503 @ 55.8917,084 @ 48.81
Ernest Tydesley14990 @ 55.0038,874 @ 45.46
Charlie Davis151,301 @ 54.205,536 @ 41.32
Vinod Kambli171.084 @ 54.029,965 @ 59.97
Martin Donnelly7582 @ 52.909,250 @ 47.43
Jack Ryder201,394 @ 51.6210,499 @ 44.29
Lee Irvine4353 @ 50.429,919 @ 40.48
Phil Mead171,185 @ 49.4755,061 @ 47.67
Aftab Baloch297 @ 48.509,171 @ 41.68
Vijay Merchant10859 @ 47.7213,470 @ 71.64
Phil Jaques11902 @ 47.4716,035 @ 48.29
Archie Jackson8474 @ 47.404,383 @ 45.65
Raman Subba Row13984 @ 46.8514,182 @ 41.46
Martin Love5233 @ 46.6016,807 @ 49.57
Rusi Modi10736 @ 46.007,529 @ 53.02
Len Baichan3184 @ 46.004,504 @ 51.18
Herbie Collins191,352 @ 45.069,924 @ 40.01
Ranjiitsinhji15989 @ 44.9524,692 @ 56.37
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
I know players with one Test are excluded and he doesn't actually have a batting average, but Stuart Law was a genuinely high class bat at First Class level who would have played more in another era.
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
The history of Test cricket is littered with players who played 20 or fewer Tests yet whose batting averages suggested they warranted longer careers. There are several possible reasons why many of these players didn’t receive more opportunities. Injuries, bans, intervention of wars and the presence of established, well performed batsmen are all factors.

If we begin with a qualification of a batting average on excess of 45 there is a significant number of players in the list. Given that averages can be skewed by one innings, I have overlooked players who played in just a one-off test. In many cases, a check of the player’s first class career stats gives evidence as to why their Test careers were limited. From that perspective I have put a qualification that the player should have a first class batting average in excess of 40. Finally, I haven’t included players who are currently playing at a first class level.

Having imposed these restrictions I am left with 25 names (actually 24, but I couldn’t resist putting in the final candidate). In order of Test batting average they are presented below, together with their first class batting average. Members might like to suggest a batting order for the 6 players they see as the “best of” in the list. Please let me know if I have overlooked any player that should be included.

PlayerTestsTest BattingFirst Class Batting
Barry Richards4508 @ 72.5728,358 @ 54.74
Stewie Dempster10723 @ 65.7212,145 @ 44.98
Sid Barnes131,072 @ 63.058,333 @ 54.11
Eddie Paynter201,540 @ 59.2320,075 @ 42.26
K.S.Duleepsinhji12995 @ 58.5215,485 @ 49.96
Ken Weekes2173 @ 57.661,731 @ 40.25
Jack Russell10910 @ 56.8727,354 @ 41.57
Brad Hodge6503 @ 55.8917,084 @ 48.81
Ernest Tydesley14990 @ 55.0038,874 @ 45.46
Charlie Davis151,301 @ 54.205,536 @ 41.32
Vinod Kambli171.084 @ 54.029,965 @ 59.97
Martin Donnelly7582 @ 52.909,250 @ 47.43
Jack Ryder201,394 @ 51.6210,499 @ 44.29
Lee Irvine4353 @ 50.429,919 @ 40.48
Phil Mead171,185 @ 49.4755,061 @ 47.67
Aftab Baloch297 @ 48.509,171 @ 41.68
Vijay Merchant10859 @ 47.7213,470 @ 71.64
Phil Jaques11902 @ 47.4716,035 @ 48.29
Archie Jackson8474 @ 47.404,383 @ 45.65
Raman Subba Row13984 @ 46.8514,182 @ 41.46
Martin Love5233 @ 46.6016,807 @ 49.57
Rusi Modi10736 @ 46.007,529 @ 53.02
Len Baichan3184 @ 46.004,504 @ 51.18
Herbie Collins191,352 @ 45.069,924 @ 40.01
Ranjiitsinhji15989 @ 44.9524,692 @ 56.37
Jesse Ryder only averaged 41 but could've averaged mid 40s (should've been at least as good as Ross Taylor) and could bowl. Should've been 100 tests averaging 45+ with the bat and 35 with the ball.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I know players with one Test are excluded and he doesn't actually have a batting average, but Stuart Law was a genuinely high class bat at First Class level who would have played more in another era.
I know it's a different format, but I always felt Law's average of 26 from 54 ODIs hinted he probably was a tad overrated
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
And personally I've always thought Sid Barnes was one of the biggest what ifs. He plays 5 more tests while maintaining that average and he gets the Headley/Pollock reputation
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I know it's a different format, but I always felt Law's average of 26 from 54 ODIs hinted he probably was a tad overrated
That wasn't as bad back then as it is now. Steve Waugh only just averaged over 30 in ODIs.

Law averaged 34 in List A cricket and over 50 in FC. So the format made a big difference regardless of level
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
I know it's a different format, but I always felt Law's average of 26 from 54 ODIs hinted he probably was a tad overrated
That's why I specified First Class Cricket. I didn't see any of his ODI innings, but he played quite a lot of Country Cricket at a time when the standard was still semi decent and looked high class.
 

tony p

First Class Debutant
As requested, a top 6 batting order,

1 Barry Richards, so unlucky, would have been an all time great.
2 Jack Russell, one of my favourites, 5 Test hundreds, last 3 test innings, 96, 140+111, then along came Sutcliffe
3 Duleepsinhji, magnificent player, want him at 3
4 Martin Donnelly, war interrupted, plus NZ hardly played any tests, you read about him, a probable all time great
5 Phil Mead, just incase a top order collapse, new how to bat long periods, firstclass record speaks for it's self
6 Eddie Paynter, a bit of dash to tire out bowlers after bowling to the first 5.

First reserve,
Vijay Merchant, quality to bat in the top 3 if anyone had a dip in form.
 

Aritro

International Regular
That Stewie Dempster could play a bit, couldn't he? What a shame they didn't play more often back then.

I've just looked up Ken Weekes to see if he's any relation to Everton - and yes, he's his cousin. Also turns out he was born in Boston and died in Brooklyn. America's greatest cricketer.

Kambli's test average being 54 is also a surprise. Always imagined him as a Graeme Hick type who kept falling over at the last hurdle. I mostly remember his huge earrings.
 

_00_deathscar

International Regular
Kambli's test average being 54 is also a surprise. Always imagined him as a Graeme Hick type who kept falling over at the last hurdle. I mostly remember his huge earrings.
Started off very strong - had a dip, a couple of good performances again - then another dip, and then was practically never seen again. When he scored he seemed to go quite big.

He clearly wasn't mentally strong enough, but there is a pretty good argument that he also wasn't handled very well.
 

Aritro

International Regular
Started off very strong - had a dip, a couple of good performances again - then another dip, and then was practically never seen again. When he scored he seemed to go quite big.

He clearly wasn't mentally strong enough, but there is a pretty good argument that he also wasn't handled very well.
Yeah, and he was in the system before anyone in the west, let alone the SC, had heard of the words "mental health". Not sure what was going on for him, but he'd probably find it easier to negotiate life with the insights that are ubiquitous now.

EDIT: It might not have been anything diagnosable as a mental health problem either, to be fair.
 
Last edited:

_00_deathscar

International Regular
Yeah, and he was in the system before anyone in the west, let alone the SC, had heard of the words "mental health". Not sure what was going on for him, but he'd probably find it easier to negotiate life with the insights that are ubiquitous now.

EDIT: It might not have been anything diagnosable as a mental health problem either, to be fair.
Not sure about actual mental health issues, but a lot was said about his attitude - and at times post-career it has also come through. He does seem a bit bitter, but maybe reasonably so.
Far lesser players were given a longer leash - quite a few have played 20-30-40 or so tests.

Of course there's no substitute for a good attitude, but I think he should have been at least allowed to fail, rather than binning him off with a ~55 average.
 

a massive zebra

International Captain
I've just looked up Ken Weekes to see if he's any relation to Everton - and yes, he's his cousin. Also turns out he was born in Boston and died in Brooklyn. America's greatest cricketer.
Certainly not! Bart King takes this title by a distance.

My top 6 would be:

Barry Richards
Vijay Merchant
K.S. Ranjitsinhji
Martin Donnelly
Archie Jackson
Phil Mead

All amongst the best batsmen of their generation and the top four would all be in contention for an all time XI from their respective countries. Richards and Ranji would also have a claim to have been the #1 batsman in the world at some point in their careers.
 
Last edited:

Magrat Garlick

Global Moderator
i'm now in love with the fact that there are two cricketers named Jack Russell who kept not being selected for, uh, reasons
 

Top