Request Your Custom Title Now!
Point taken. However why do you object to his nomination? Rather you should just quietly place your vote and stay out of an argument. If you think someone else should be in there then nominate him. Samuels already has two votes. If others want to vote for him, let them...it's their personal vote afterall.Originally posted by Bazzaroodoo
That was your initial definition. I would interpret that as the best batsman in the world who is under 25 (people's definition of young may vary). Not "oh he might be really good in 2004", based on 2 test matches. If he performs well in 2004, I'll vote for him then. For now my vote goes to someone more deserving.
No offence is intended by this post and it is said in a passive voice.