Agreed dude, but this is strictly a WC XIGreat montage harsh, but Joel Garner's stats are superior to every other bowler in all of ODI history (in relative terms of course).
ER = 3.09
Overall ER for Garner's period = 4.00
Difference = 0.91
Average = 18.84
Overall Average for Garner's period = 29.60
Difference = 10.76
Compared to Wasim for example;
ER = 3.89
Overall ER for Wasim's period = 4.45
Difference = 0.56
Average = 23.52
Overall Average for Wasim's period = 32.37
Difference = 8.85
If Viv Ruchards is the first batsman picked then Joel Garner has to be the first bowler picked.
For a world cup XI, Warne > Murali.Agreed dude, but this is strictly a WC XI![]()
Yeah, Warne comes very close to Murali in the WCs. But he just played 2 WCs compared to Murali's 5. Warne was better than Murali in '96 and '99 of course.For a world cup XI, Warne > Murali.
The cricinfo choices suck balls. No Bevan? WTF. And why in the blue hell in ramiz raja an option as a batsman?![]()
Haha I remember just before the 2011 India vs Australia quarterfinal, Hussey gave an interview saying Zaheer Khan is a master of reverse swing and he's virtually impossible to play after the 30th over. Then in the match, Hussey scores a golden duck and gets out to Zaheer in the 34th over or so. It was a lol moment.Hussey was a sack of **** in WCs but he did have some severe injury situation right before the 2011 tournament and there was a whole ridiculous saga where it looked like he was removed from the squad, Greg Chappell in all his wisdom said he should retire, and then a few days later he was back in the squad again. Was all very strange and can't have helped him at all.
OK cool....Agreed dude, but this is strictly a WC XI![]()
???Dear God 4 WCs and only 1 Aussie. Give us McGrath back and we'd smash that lot. I mean Klusener ffs...please.
No such thingOS - you have one bowler too many. Can do with one extra batsman.