• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Smith SA (away) or Kohli's India (home): Which had the more impressive record?

Better Team Record


  • Total voters
    18

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
But they both drew! Not to mention they played less series at home.
Check the context of the two series Australia drew from 99 to 2007. One rain affected series, the other without McWarne. Outside of that, they won 40 out of 43 games. That win level is insane.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Check the context of the two series Australia drew from 99 to 2007. One rain affected series, the other without McWarne. Outside of that, they won 40 out of 43 games. That win level is insane.
Really good record. But India also have played significant amount of series without Bumrah and Ashwin, Jadeja, Kohli everyone has missed matches. Injuries is a part of a game, your best players can miss matches; that's where bench strength comes in. Which Australia had ridiculously high for batting back then; but not really much for bowling. Overall, drawing both the series is on them (and they were actually lucky to not have lost the India one).
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Really good record. But India also have played significant amount of series without Bumrah and Ashwin, Jadeja, Kohli everyone has missed matches. Injuries is a part of a game, your best players can miss matches; that's where bench strength comes in. Which Australia had ridiculously high for batting back then; but not really much for bowling. Overall, drawing both the series is on them (and they were actually lucky to not have lost the India one).
How many series did they play without Jadeja and Ashwin together? That would be the equivalent of no McWarne.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
But SA beating up on an Australian side in transition twice is? Interesting.
Yes. Check out their Melbourne victory in 2008. And saving the game in Adelaide in 2012.

Far more heroic than simply serving up the same spiced wickets and waiting for Ashwin and Jadeja to get the job done.
 

Slifer

International Captain
Fewer series and more draws. It's definitely close though.
That was by design. Wi played 2/3 of their series in the 80s away. For example in a 10 year period they played Australia 5 times: 4 away and once at home. Why? Money and quite frankly fear. Pakistan that drew with WI in 1988 was impressive but WI were no where near their peak and missing : Lloyd, Garner and Holding.

Make no mistake, India has been more dominant at home percentage wise but give more teams from the 80s more tests in the Caribbean and they'd have been blanked. And tests back then, if time was loss due to rain etc, there were no such things as starting the match early or extended sessions. Case in point, Australia's tour to the WI in 1984. That wouldve/should've been a 5-0 white wash had time been made up after losing play due to weather.

Anyway to answer the question, I'd say it's honestly a toss up. India's streak at home is the most dominant and unprecedented but it also takes a special team to go undefeated away over an extended period of time. And RSA was going undefeated away vs decent Australian and Indian teams. Neither have ever been slouches at home.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
That was by design. Wi played 2/3 of their series in the 80s away. For example in a 10 year period they played Australia 5 times: 4 away and once at home. Why? Money and quite frankly fear. Pakistan that drew with WI in 1988 was impressive but WI were no where near their peak and missing : Lloyd, Garner and Holding.

Make no mistake, India has been more dominant at home percentage wise but give more teams from the 80s more tests in the Caribbean and they'd have been blanked. And tests back then, if time was loss due to rain etc, there were no such things as starting the match early or extended sessions. Case in point, Australia's tour to the WI in 1984. That wouldve/should've been a 5-0 white wash had time been made up after losing play due to weather.

Anyway to answer the question, I'd say it's honestly a toss up. India's streak at home is the most dominant and unprecedented but it also takes a special team to go undefeated away over an extended period of time. And RSA was going undefeated away vs decent Australian and Indian teams. Neither have ever been slouches at home.
As it is from the late 70s to end 80s, WI played 30 games and lost 1.
 

PaulLennon

U19 Captain
Yes. Check out their Melbourne victory in 2008. And saving the game in Adelaide in 2012.

Far more heroic than simply serving up the same spiced wickets and waiting for Ashwin and Jadeja to get the job done.
2016 NZ, 2016 Eng, 2019 SA, 2024 Eng were very very fair wickets. India's record in those series are 11-1 with 1 match lost by 20 runs.

Spicy wickets actually enabled Aus to win matches in both 2017 and 2023. On fairer wickets in those series they were found wanting.

Also Shami, Bumrah, Siraj, Bhuvi, Umesh etc have outbowled all visiting pacers by a huge margin - these include Rabada, Cummins, Anderson, Broad, Southee, Boult etc.

Don't be so salty about "spicy" wickets. Also SA's reign away streak ended in brutal fashion when a team of Amla, ABD, Steyn, Faf were destroyed 3-0 by a rookie Indian team in 2015 (would have been 4-0 if not for rain). Ind's home streak is still going (and is not likely to be broken soon considering how the strongest contenders were defeated by a team in transition in 2023 and 2024).
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
2016 NZ, 2016 Eng, 2019 SA, 2024 Eng were very very fair wickets. India's record in those series are 11-1 with 1 match lost by 20 runs.

Spicy wickets actually enabled Aus to win matches in both 2017 and 2023. On fairer wickets in those series they were found wanting.
India have been dominant at home. That isn't necessarily heroic though, where they battle tough odds. Instead they have started every test as favorites. You can't have your cake and eat it too.


Don't be so salty about "spicy" wickets. Also SA's reign away streak ended in brutal fashion when a team of Amla, ABD, Steyn, Faf were destroyed 3-0 by a rookie Indian team in 2015 (would have been 4-0 if not for rain). Ind's home streak is still going (and is not likely to be broken soon considering how the strongest contenders were defeated by a team in transition in 2023 and 2024).
That's all good. Though should be mentioned that SA side was missing Smith and Kallis who were critical for their reign away. Steyn also broke down.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
2016 NZ, 2016 Eng, 2019 SA, 2024 Eng were very very fair wickets. India's record in those series are 11-1 with 1 match lost by 20 runs.

Spicy wickets actually enabled Aus to win matches in both 2017 and 2023. On fairer wickets in those series they were found wanting.

Also Shami, Bumrah, Siraj, Bhuvi, Umesh etc have outbowled all visiting pacers by a huge margin - these include Rabada, Cummins, Anderson, Broad, Southee, Boult etc.

Don't be so salty about "spicy" wickets. Also SA's reign away streak ended in brutal fashion when a team of Amla, ABD, Steyn, Faf were destroyed 3-0 by a rookie Indian team in 2015 (would have been 4-0 if not for rain). Ind's home streak is still going (and is not likely to be broken soon considering how the strongest contenders were defeated by a team in transition in 2023 and 2024).
Avoid this argument in current capacity, it's pointless because India's run hasn't ended yet......and you can't compare apples with oranges. It's like comparing a bowler with a batsman. You have to compare the whole record, not selected bits and pieces to suit a certain agenda.
 
Last edited:

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
IMG_8334.jpeg

SA won in Aus
then lost to Aus in SA
then drew to Eng in SA

then drew a 2 test series in India
then drew 0-0 in UAE

then allowed India to draw in SA
then allowed Australia to draw in SA
then allowed SL to win a test in SA

This is how South Africa performed over a whole 3-4 year period!

How is this anyway comparable to India winning every single series at home and recently managing to at least draw every series away (besides NZ).
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
If a team wins a series away then loses to same team at HOME, it's not an achievement. You are back to square one.

It's almost same as winning at home and losing away.

Net home away result is 1-1.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
If a team wins a series away then loses to same team at HOME, it's not an achievement. You are back to square one.

It's almost same as winning at home and losing away.

Net home away result is 1-1.
You missed the entire point of the thread.

SA's away record is achievement in itself. The fact that they couldn't match this at home is another separate issue.

Otherwise, I can say that India away losses discredits their entire home record.

I also noticed how you stopped the period just as SA were about to win in NZ, Eng and Aus on the trot and won a slate of home series.
 
Last edited:

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
How is this anyway comparable to India winning every single series at home and recently managing to at least draw every series away (besides NZ).
In the period in question, India lost in SA in 2018 and 2022, lost heavily in England in 2018 and were whitewashed in NZ in 2020. Also lost two WTC finals. So they also have a spotty away record.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
How many series did they play without Jadeja and Ashwin together? That would be the equivalent of no McWarne.
Australia doesn't gets brownie points from me neither for not having both of their frontliners nor for having a decent reserve. Like, I can assure you, even if Ashwin and Jadeja doesn't plays in a series, with the likes of Bumrah, Shami, Kuldeep, Axar, etc and will still most likely win.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
You missed the entire point of the thread.

SA's away record is achievement in itself. The fact that they couldn't match this at home is another separate issue.

Otherwise, I can say that India away losses discredits their entire home record.

I also noticed how you stopped the period just as SA were about to win in NZ, Eng and Aus on the trot and won a slate of home series.
Umm no, right after SA's away wins, Australia again beat SA in SA in 2013.

England too beat SA in SA in the return series in 2015.

So it's like India winning away in Pakistan and then losing the return home series in India. And then India winning in SL against Murali and then somehow losing the return series in India.
 

Top