Miller when he doesn't get captaincyAn interesting question is - how often would Miller bowl himself? (you’d presume in an average side he’d be given captaincy) He was reticent to bowl himself iirc, and on an average team would he not try and focus more on his batting? Interesting hypothetical
heh, I don’t see him taking it that seriously or respecting an “average” captainMiller when he doesn't get captaincy
I will say this - Miller could definitely bowl a lot when required. In fact both have the same amount of innings where they bowled 40+ overs (3)also I feel like Miller's WPI is a very overblown point, the fact is that he never bothered to bowl much to tail as others cleaned that up. As far as top 7 wickets go
Miller: 1.39 per innings.
Lindwall: 1.42 per innings.
Pollock: 1.47 per inning.
not really bad.
NahMiller the better "allrounder", Pollock the more valuable player.
Wtf, is he Ash's Charizard?heh, I don’t see him taking it that seriously or respecting an “average” captain
Sure, why notWtf, is he Ash's Charizard?
If theses are the stats were pulling out, it must be getting desperate.also I feel like Miller's WPI is a very overblown point, the fact is that he never bothered to bowl much to tail as others cleaned that up. As far as top 7 wickets go
Miller: 1.39 per innings.
Lindwall: 1.42 per innings.
Pollock: 1.47 per inning.
not really bad.
He saw himself as a batsman and even in first class was resistant to taking on heavy workloads.An interesting question is - how often would Miller bowl himself? (you’d presume in an average side he’d be given captaincy) He was reticent to bowl himself iirc, and on an average team would he not try and focus more on his batting? Interesting hypothetical
Why? Miller just didn't tailender bash, his wicket rate of tail enders is very low, only 22%, normally it's 29% ro 30+If theses are the stats were pulling out, it must be getting desperate.