• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Sehwag, Dravid, Tendulkar and Laxman, vs Hayden, Ponting, Mark Waugh and Steve Waugh

Better quartet


  • Total voters
    26

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
And a significant in a much tougher top 3 as well.

8 runs Era boost??
It's not eight runs.

You include the top 3 numbers, and then you still need to account for the boost of playing majority 5/6 and the era.

This is silly man. Even after batting majority easier position in the flattest era ever, there's only a 3 point average difference between them. It's obvious they are the same level.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
It's not eight runs.

You include the top 3 numbers, and then you still need to account for the boost of playing majority 5/6 and the era.

This is silly man. Even after batting majority easier position in the flattest era ever, there's only a 3 point average difference between them. It's obvious they are the same level.
It's 8 runs removing the opening numbers over a slightly longer period, yes.

Top 3 numbers cancels out the batting position boost, era is fair.

Again with the batting position! No, accounting for his top 3 percentage of innings, batting position is done. If you want to argue position, then remove his top 3 career. There's also a significant longevity advantage.
 

subshakerz

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's 8 runs removing the opening numbers over a slightly longer period, yes.

Top 3 numbers cancels out the batting position boost, era is fair.

Again with the batting position! No, accounting for his top 3 percentage of innings, batting position is done. If you want to argue position, then remove his top 3 career. There's also a significant longevity advantage.
You can't remove opening numbers, and top 3 being only half of his time at 5/6 doesn't cancel it out, there is still a net advantage for batting late in the order.

Notice how you simultaneously want to have his opening numbers not counted to make his overall average better, but also counted to cancel out his late order batting advantage.
 

Bolo.

International Captain
Indians are clearly better. There is very little in it on a test by test basis though. In a one off test, it's almost a coin flip as to which unit performs better, although the Indians would outperform a bit more often.

The extra longevity puts them a distance ahead though. The average team is going to benefit a lot from fielding a quality bat in place of their worst one for x extra years.
 

DrWolverine

International Captain
Hayden > Sehwag
Ponting > Dravid
Sachin > Steve
Laxman > Mark

Best batsmen in this group : Sachin
Lowest rated batsmen among them : Mark
 

Top