?? His pressure adjusted average is already 120.Tendulkar easily couldve averaged 120 if he had played for his numbers and padded his stats.
I think it's safe to assume everyone would agree that he wouldn't have an average if the pressure factor was considered, so I chose to ignore it for the purpose of this discussion.?? His pressure adjusted average is already 120.
No, you got this maths wrong. Mcgrath 100% better than Tendulkar.In WC battles McGrath beat Sachin 2-1 out of 3, which is 66-33%. Therefore, mathematically speaking McGrath is 33% better a player than Sachin
I had completely wiped that match off my memory, truly showed the gulf between Australia and the other teams when the other finalists got destroyed two times in a row.I missed the group match in 2003 where India got all out for 120 odd and Tendulkar top scored with 36, getting out to dizzy.
Yeah tbf most of the regular Indians are pretty good, especially with HB gone. There's a few really dire ones but they don't post much so meh, the more biased Aussies OTOH do (though I do think their biasness is over-stated, but coming from me is that saying much?)It's like the Indian fans here are expected to atone for crappy casuals elsewhere. Regular Indian posters here are pretty decent and unbiased. I'd say the direness of Kilowatt and such is sufficiently countered by Stephen's ever raging hard-on for Warne.