are we including Player A when he played against non-test standard teams?...and Player B on pitches that took spin?Let's settle it.
Player B only played in country C three times and averaged 11 with the bat.are we including Player A when he played against non-test standard teams?...and Player B on pitches that took spin?
but his strike rate was 89 when it was cloudyPlayer B only played in country C three times and averaged 11 with the bat.
But he averaged in the upper sixties in matches where the number of spectators was between 33 and 78. That I believe is an all time world recordbut his strike rate was 89 when it was cloudy
But he averaged in the upper sixties in matches where the number of spectators was between 33 and 78. That I believe is an all time world record
But as they both now play for England....because when was the last time they had an English born batsman who averaged over 50 .... the question is still difficultPlayer A and Player B have very similar records. But because Player A is Australian, and Player B a New Zealander, that automatically means that Player A must be rated better.
The way I found this site in the first place was through searching for "Vasbert Drakes" on google, I owe it to him to cast my vote his way.
The number of spectators in that game was bolstered by free tickets distributed by the sponsors. We do not recognise such spurious recordsSJS, I think you have been reading out of date stats, the record is now held by Player X with an average of 71
Is that why Player G's List A average does not include all those runs he plundered in that tour of that non-test teamThe number of spectators in that game was bolstered by free tickets distributed by the sponsors. We do not recognise such spurious records
What sarcasm is that???? .....oh you must be referring to Vasbert Drakes being in the Poll.....that is of course the irrelevant 3rd option and should not be taken so seriously SJSWhere are the guys on whom all this sarcasm is addressed (and wasted I think) ?
Now you are taking me too seriously.What sarcasm is that???? .....oh you must be referring to Vasbert Drakes being in the Poll.....that is of course the irrelevant 3rd option and should not be taken so seriously SJS