• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Peak Bumrah vs Peak Imran

Who is the better test bowler at their peak?


  • Total voters
    33

Randomfan

U19 Vice-Captain
Where did the 14 go? You might have referred to a different timespan earlier.

And that Home and Away split is unreal.
Problem comes when there is no consitent period for making a point and periods keep changing. Having said that, let's take one of the periods cited above,

Home - 71 wickets - Avg 13 - 6 5-fers
Away - 89 wickets - Avg 22 - 6 5-fers


1752766183477.png

I am sure some one can now pick a different period to make it look better depending on what's being argued but point will still stand,

IK has 100+ wickets at home at avg of 12 at home in 5-6 years. Clearly, among all great bowlers IK stands tall at home, but he was not stand out in quality otherwise we would have seen something similar away as well. No other bowler playing with him had such a gulf between home and away when they were at their best. It simply does not happen.

I take IK's some great away series as proof of his greatness and not his home record. That's the reason I put him ahead of Wasim.
 

Attachments

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Problem comes when there is no consitent period for making a point and periods keep changing. Having said that, let's take one of the periods cited above,

Home - 71 wickets - Avg 13 - 6 5-fers
Away - 89 wickets - Avg 22 - 6 5-fers


View attachment 48724

I am sure some one can now pick a different period to make it look better depending on what's being argued but point will still stand,

IK has 100+ wickets at home at avg of 12 at home in 5-6 years. Clearly, among all great bowlers IK stands tall at home, but he was not stand out in quality otherwise we would have seen something similar away as well. No other bowler playing with him had such a gulf between home and away when they were at their best. It simply does not happen.

I take IK's some great away series as proof of his greatness and not his home record. That's the reason I put him ahead of Wasim.
he is averaging 22 away in your graph, Bumrah averages 21 away minus West Indies, Imran just murders him at home
 

Randomfan

U19 Vice-Captain
he is averaging 22 away in your graph, Bumrah averages 21 away minus West Indies, Imran just murders him at home
I did not pick any cut off, You listed a bunch of different cut off dates for IK's peak. I am not even going to bother look for career peak cut off dates for Bumrah because his entire career is close to peak.

Bumrah away against top 4 oppositions so far : 143 wickets - Avg 20 - 10 5-fers
IK's output you are citing for away against non-minnows: 89 wickets - avg 22 - 6 5-fers

As far as IK murdering at home during peak is concerned, that's 100% correct and that's the exact point I raised. He has murdered all bowlers at home during his peak and yet his away record was never a stand out among his peer group. IK murdering anyone during peak at home is not due to his skill set exclusively.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
A little fun something...

Imran – 22.81
Other bowlers in his games – 34.32

Bumrah – 19.48
Other bowlers in his games – 28.45

Batting averages in their games

Imran – 30.95

Bumrah – 26.05

Very...Interesting
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
A little fun something...

Imran – 22.81
Other bowlers in his games – 34.32

Bumrah – 19.48
Other bowlers in his games – 28.45

Batting averages in their games

Imran – 30.95

Bumrah – 26.05

Very...Interesting
for Example, SF Barnes

Barnes – 16.43
Others bowlers in his games – 28.19

Batting – 24.64
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
He has murdered all bowlers at home during his peak and yet his away record was never a stand out among his peer group.
If we look at post WSC till 1988, he takes 19 wickets @19 in India in 80, 16 wickets@19 in Aus in 81, 21 wickets@18 in 82 and 21 wickets@21 in 87 in England and 23 wickets@18 in WI in 88, and 15 wickets@19 in SL in 86.

He only has one poor series in India in 87 on tailormade draw wickets.

So what's his problem away in peak?
 

Randomfan

U19 Vice-Captain
If we look at post WSC till 1988, he takes 19 wickets @19 in India in 80, 16 wickets@19 in Aus in 81, 21 wickets@18 in 82 and 21 wickets@21 in 87 in England and 23 wickets@18 in WI in 88, and 15 wickets@19 in SL in 86.

He only has one poor series in India in 87 on tailormade draw wickets.

So what's his problem away in peak?
Who said anything about problem away in peak?

Comment was about keeping IK's 100+ home wicket at avg of 12 during his peak in context. He was stand out by a huge margin at home, but not away against his peers who played at the same time. There was a reason for that and that reason does not dissapears if we compare him with bowlers of different eras.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Who said anything about problem away in peak?

Comment was about keeping IK's 100+ home wicket at avg of 12 during his peak in context. He was stand out by a huge margin at home, but not away against his peers who played at the same time. There was a reason for that and that reason does not dissapears if we compare him with bowlers of different eras.
Of course he benefitted from tampering but it was also a factor of reverse being an unknown phenomenon to unsuspecting bats and those home grounds being the ideal conditions to reverse.
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Wanna see @kyear2 reaction on this😀
To what?

Literally no one takes his home numbers at face value

And no one doubts he was an ATG fast bowler.
But can someone finally admit that no other great player has the questions around them and their career that he had?

Because everyone loves to pretend they didn't exist.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
I know Imran tampered but Bumrah has so many advantages over him, the balls Bumrah bowls have a much more reinforced and refined seam for movement lasting much longer as both the Kookabura and Dukes were redesigned to swing and seam much longer and basically forever, every wicket is more sporting except maybe Edgbaston this series but Bumrah didn't play that. The Batting and Bowling output in Bumrah's games is closer to the games Sydney Barnes played than it is to the games Imran Khan played, I repeat, the Batting and Bowling output in Bumrah's games is closer to Sydney Francis Barnes's games, than Imran Khan's.

Imran used tampering to equalise the playing field, having the historically most batting friendly roadiest road wickets ever for home and a ball that would get old in five overs, I reckon Bumrah has enough advantages over Imran that the latter constructing a single advantage doesn't mean we should disqualify his record.
 
Last edited:

Top