Seems like we're getting it.We need something pretty decent from the debutant now.
I am still unsure why the switch was made from Fortuin to him. Might just be a Conrad pick but he is always high value on decks like this.
No doubt @Fuller Pilch will be delighted to see this when he wakes up.We need something pretty decent from the debutant now.
I wasn't sure to begin with because his batting isn't exactly powerhouse but I think over time it would prove more consistent than Fortuin. And not a bad insurance when you have Brevis , Bosch and Linde at 5,6,7.I am still unsure why the switch was made from Fortuin to him. Might just be a Conrad pick but he is always high value on decks like this.
The weird thing is that even though Muthusamy plays and seems like more of a batter, I’m pretty sure Fortuin has more FC hundreds at the top level? It’s a little weird if you think about it!I wasn't sure to begin with because his batting isn't exactly powerhouse but I think over time it would prove more consistent than Fortuin. And not a bad insurance when you have Brevis , Bosch and Linde at 5,6,7.
He is growing on me, a bit like Corbin.
I do get the feeling that Bjorn feels he is unlucky but if Sen backs up Shukri's hunch then there is no need to look back.
Muthusamy has more hundreds, but it's from more games. He's got 9 from 112 games and Fortuin has 7 from 71, so Fortuin's actually scores hundreds more frequently. He also has the better batting average, although it's 31.03 compared to 30.78, which is a very marginal difference. Muthusamy does have more fifties though, 30 compared to Fortuin's 9, which suggests he's the more consistent batsman.The weird thing is that even though Muthusamy plays and seems like more of a batter, I’m pretty sure Fortuin has more FC hundreds at the top level? It’s a little weird if you think about it!