sledger
Spanish_Vicente
Yeah, I suspect the logic might have been "if Fiend faces Brock then one of them has to lose, and we can't have that" - lame but predictableOh I agree 100% on a nope for Seth vs Brock; just that it "makes sense" in WWE's stupid booking minds.
I still maintain that Bray shouldn't have been fighting Seth at all. I know he's the biggest thing etc but the belt really does nothing for him at this point - it's hardly going to make him more over.
Rather give him another biggish-name opponent like the Finn Balor match (although preferably a heel character) and have him destroy them.
Ziggler would have been fun with his selling ability, or perhaps Baron Corbin. Someone who would be big talk going into the match, but get a huge crowd pop for being destroyed by The Fiend.
Disagree re: the second point though. Bray is biggest thing in the company, strike while the iron is hot, the reaction to him losing the match shows precisely what they had to gain by putting him over. Not least because loser Seth has been a horrible champ
Ziggler and Corbin are both total geeks and shouldn't be associated with any top level guys at the moment, they have mediocre written all over them (albeit for different reasons - and tbf to Corbin he has improved a lot over the last year or so)