• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India in Australia

Nate

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
What's the problem with that decision? Looked good to me. Hogg's had a few good shouts, about time one was given.
 
A

Anil

Hall of Fame Member
sideshowtim said:
Yes, unlucky that he had a brain explosion and played a horrible shot. The decision was fine.
Click to expand...
Son Of Coco said:
He should have hit it...it takes away the luck element.
Click to expand...
he missed it but he was trying to play a shot, he was as forward as anyone could be and there was no way the umpire could have judged the height of the ball by the time it'd have reached the stumps, there was a significant element of doubt there and the benefit of doubt usually goes to the batsman...anyway he is gone, no point in going on and on about it...
 
sideshowtim

sideshowtim

Banned
Anil said:
he missed it but he was trying to play a shot, he was as forward as anyone could be and there was no way the umpire could have judged the height of the ball by the time it'd have hit the stumps, there was a significant element of doubt there and the benefit of doubt usually goes to the batsman...anyway he is gone, no point in going on and on about it...
Click to expand...
He was indeed far down but the ball hit him very low on the pad.
 
Son Of Coco

Son Of Coco

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Anil said:
he missed it but he was trying to play a shot, he was as forward as anyone could be and there was no way the umpire could have judged the height of the ball by the time it'd have reached the stumps, there was a significant element of doubt there and the benefit of doubt usually goes to the batsman...anyway he is gone, no point in going on and on about it...
Click to expand...
What I want to know, is why he stood around after being given out!!! I thought we'd ridded ourselves of this unsportsman-like travesty of ill thought out behaviour in Sydney...I'm off to write a poorly-worded column to the local rag! :happy:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top