• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* CW XI in Pakistan and Bangladesh

Magrat Garlick

Rather Mad Witch
Trouble is, we've got to change the rules then, and that means a Player Representative vote. Cos it's clearly down in the selection panel rules that there is a tour-by-tour representative.

Marc: Wee bit more constructive than that? Yes, I know who you're thinking of... ;)
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
To be honest I wasn't Sam - I have a couple of ideas, but neither are who you think I'm thinking of.
 

Cloete

International Captain
Samuel_Vimes said:
We sort of forgot about that rule and why Sangrah was on the panel (at least I did) - therefore, when he became inactive, we picked Cloete, who was inactive...any other suggestions for TBT reps?
To be fair I was only inactive because as far as I remember I wasn't needed at all...

Anyway the bangladeshi game was shocking, and as marc said it proved how complacent we had become (Me espcially!!!).
 

Cloete

International Captain
Andre said:
TBH, I don't see the need for one.
Exactly....I mean during my time i checked virtually every e-mail sent to me but in none of them I checked I was needed to make any decisions.. the selectors get along fine, which is always good to see!
 

lord_of_darkness

Cricket Web XI Moderator
Marc like i had told you, the TBT was there from the outcome of the original meeting but scrapped now as it seemed unnecessary.

That is a bit right there has bit tiny little internal conflicts within the team and the team looks unfocussed , and seems to drift away from its main objective at times. I mean lets leave the selectors work for the selectors and the boards work for the board and the players and coaches do what they have to do to peform at their very best and get the best results.
Just lets solely concentrate on our purpose team.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
The thing is I don't remember the scapping of the TBT being discussed at any point, and it appears that one member seems to think he is the TBT, yet you're now saying there isn't such a post?!
 

Andre

International Regular
Marc, we already have 4 selectors who are working well together. A Tour by tour selector is unheard of anyway, generally speaking. Please, just leave us to work with what we have.

We'll do our job, you do yours.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
This contradicts that though Andre!

Samuel_Vimes said:
Trouble is, we've got to change the rules then, and that means a Player Representative vote. Cos it's clearly down in the selection panel rules that there is a tour-by-tour representative.

If things are agreed by the people at large, then they can't be changed by individuals without reference to the people in general. Wasn't that what the revolution was about?
 

Andre

International Regular
The tour by tour selector hasn't been in use since Sangrah was off the panel....

If it really distressed you that much, you would have spoken up then. No one did, so all we can assume is that there is no problem with the system in place. Please, just let us get on with our job...

The people at large didn't complain, it's only you 6+ months on who brought it up!
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
To clear a few things up, Cloete was the replacement TBT when Sangrah left the Panel. He did not participate in discussion at all and it was I think decided that we would go to him only if we have a tied vote, which we haven't had since.

Cloete is no longer the TBT but is available for a ghost vote until we get around to selecting another TBT if only to please certain people.
 

bugssy

Cricketer Of The Year
Mr Mxyzptlk said:
To clear a few things up, Cloete was the replacement TBT when Sangrah left the Panel. He did not participate in discussion at all and it was I think decided that we would go to him only if we have a tied vote, which we haven't had since.

Cloete is no longer the TBT but is available for a ghost vote until we get around to selecting another TBT if only to please certain people.

what are the qualifications of applying to the tbt

can i put my hand up for the position
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
marc71178 said:
I seem to remember that nobody complained for a long time before the revolution...
Untrue. People were complaining about selection policies for a while before it.
 

lord_of_darkness

Cricket Web XI Moderator
what are the qualifications of applying to the tbt

can i put my hand up for the position
Sorry mate i dont think the position is open / required yet..

....


People know real cricketer would object against the board so much for tiny things here and there.. please leave the board and the selection panels job to them, you dont see them telling you how to play your game and what to do when your out there playing international cricket ? I know you all seem to be very over concerned at times.. but never has the board or the selection panel look like its falling apart or has there been any internal feuds that we need people telling what should be done , how it should be done ... etc.. its no where near collapse and its just going to keep growing.

So i ask you all again please.. keep it to a bare minimum or nothing please..
 

Cloete

International Captain
Mr Mxyzptlk said:
To clear a few things up, Cloete was the replacement TBT when Sangrah left the Panel. He did not participate in discussion at all and it was I think decided that we would go to him only if we have a tied vote, which we haven't had since.

Cloete is no longer the TBT but is available for a ghost vote until we get around to selecting another TBT if only to please certain people.
I have no diea what the TBT is..I was told that I was a member of the selection panel, however I am the lowest member and am only called upon when a tied vote has happened... and there hasn't/hadn't been any while i have been/am on the panel.

However I am still unclear as to whether I have been sacked yet... and if I have I am unclear as to why...
 

Andre

International Regular
You were part of the panel and everyone is equal on this panel...All 4 of us have a say. Since you didn't once contribute, you were removed from the panel.

Besides, why would you be called upon for the most important decision? That makes no sense...
 

lord_of_darkness

Cricket Web XI Moderator
Just as Andre said... no one on the selection panel is on a high or lower level. except for maybe the co chairman of the board... but still the powers on the selection panel are equal..

and am only called upon when a tied vote has happened.
i think your just quoting that from what liam said in his latest as in your previous comments you were totally unsure..

Andre - regarding the most important decision
hes talkin regarding what liam said earlier
He did not participate in discussion at all and it was I think decided that we would go to him only if we have a tied vote, which we haven't had since.

I think you werent personally sacked or anything , but because of you being inactive for the position and the lack of the contribution made earler on that position just made it a lot easier to move on and scrap it , a move to just keep moving ahead and keep proceeding with things.
 

Top