*Official* Bangladesh vs Australia Series

[Mr. P]

i also was happy with bashar

 

[marc71178]

For the 2nd time in 4 games, McGrath ends up wicketless.

Only 9 in his last 5 games actually -- must be the leanest spell of his career.

 

[Craig]

i also was happy with bashar

Yeah he played well also.

 

[age_master]

For the 2nd time in 4 games, McGrath ends up wicketless.

Only 9 in his last 5 games actually -- must be the leanest spell of his career.

yeah well with the other bowlers bowling so well at the momemt its not poor bowling on his part...

 

[Tim]

Well England have avoided the follow on so unless Graeme Smith is prepared to throw this game wide open on the final day and give England a chase, then this will be a draw.

Ashley Giles seems to be playing some good shots this morning, although I find it bizarre because the last time I saw him bat he didn't really look like he could hold one.

 

[Mr. P]

wrong thread mate

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

MacGill must be as happy as Paul Adams. The Bangladeshis are in town.

 

[marc71178]

yeah well with the other bowlers bowling so well at the momemt its not poor bowling on his part...

Even when he gets the New Ball and doesn't make a breakthrough? By that time, the other bowlers haven't had the chance!

Still think he's the Best Pace Bowler around then (bearing in mind how well Pollock is bowling)

 

[V Reddy]

MacGill must be as happy as Paul Adams. The Bangladeshis are in town.

Well S Waugh said that Ban has batted better than Pak and WI did in recent times .

 

[Mr. P]

honestly, i agree to that

 

[luckyeddie]

Just goes to show that the contributors to Cricket Web seem to know more about cricket than, er, certain pundits.

<quack> Don't beat about the bush, LE. Just come out and say that David Hookes is a dope

OK, DD. David Hookes is a dope.

<quack> he likes you.

(sound of duck being strangled). Sorry, folks. Normal service will soon be resumed.

 

[Craig]

I hope so!

 

[Mr. P]

true. really, what right did hookes have to say what he did?

 

[Mr. P]

1st ODI. bangladesh all out 105. brett lee 4 wickets

 

[Tim]

Not surprising really...I think Bangladesh are better at the longer version.

 

[Mr. P]

controversial. they've won 3 ODI's. they are yet to win a test match.

 

[Tim]

Regardless of the fact that they've failed to even draw a test match, I think from what i've seen of them they apply themselves better at the longer version..some of their batsmen seem to be able to put higher scores up.

 

[Mr. P]

they did manage to draw a test. a rained out match against the west indes.:O

 

[Tim]

Besides..Bangladesh have played alot more ODI's than they have Test Matches..so their 3 wins will be a very poor ratio to loses.

 

[Mr. P]

their win ratio in tests is....0. so i guess the ODI ratio is better!