• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** Australia in Sri Lanka Jan - Feb 2025

The_CricketUmpire

The_CricketUmpire

First Class Debutant
Steve Smith
Catches: 197
Matches: 116
Innings: 220
Average Catches per Match: 1.698
Average Catches per Innings: 0.895

Ricky Ponting
Catches: 196
Matches: 168
Innings: 328
Average Catches per Match: 1.166
Average Catches per Innings: 0.597

Mark Waugh
Catches: 181
Matches: 128
Innings: 245
Average Catches per Match: 1.414
Average Catches per Innings: 0.738

Mark Taylor
Catches: 157
Matches: 104
Innings: 197
Average Catches per Match: 1.509
Average Catches per Innings: 0.796

Allan Border
Catches: 156
Matches: 156
Innings: 277
Average Catches per Match: 1.000
Average Catches per Innings: 0.563
 
H

halba

International Debutant
The_CricketUmpire said:
Steve Smith
Catches: 197
Matches: 116
Innings: 220
Average Catches per Match: 1.698
Average Catches per Innings: 0.895

Ricky Ponting
Catches: 196
Matches: 168
Innings: 328
Average Catches per Match: 1.166
Average Catches per Innings: 0.597
Click to expand...
stats explainable- ricky ponting had flatter wickets during his era, Smith had lots of tougher wickets for batters(especially in the past 5-6 years, early on he had flatter wickets) so more catches taken. Also the batters were better during Pontings era- he had to deal with peak Indian and South african batting units. SAF was basically a 2nd australia at times.

Pakistan, SL, even Windies all had proper batting lineups in those days, they dont now, theyre all basically minnows now.

Thats why its tough to compare different eras. Quality of the teams now are ***
 
The_CricketUmpire

The_CricketUmpire

First Class Debutant
halba said:
stats explainable- ricky ponting had flatter wickets during his era, Smith had lots of tougher wickets for batters(especially in the past 5-6 years, early on he had flatter wickets) so more catches taken. Also the batters were better during Pontings era- he had to deal with peak Indian and South african batting units. SAF was basically a 2nd australia at times.

Pakistan, SL, even Windies all had proper batting lineups in those days, they dont now, theyre all basically minnows now.

Thats why its tough to compare different eras. Quality of the teams now are ***
Click to expand...
Yes all correct but my stats were about catches taken, not about batting specifically.
 
D

Darwin Award

U19 Captain
The_CricketUmpire said:
Steve Smith
Catches: 197
Matches: 116
Innings: 220
Average Catches per Match: 1.698
Average Catches per Innings: 0.895

Ricky Ponting
Catches: 196
Matches: 168
Innings: 328
Average Catches per Match: 1.166
Average Catches per Innings: 0.597

Mark Waugh
Catches: 181
Matches: 128
Innings: 245
Average Catches per Match: 1.414
Average Catches per Innings: 0.738

Mark Taylor
Catches: 157
Matches: 104
Innings: 197
Average Catches per Match: 1.509
Average Catches per Innings: 0.796

Allan Border
Catches: 156
Matches: 156
Innings: 277
Average Catches per Match: 1.000
Average Catches per Innings: 0.563
Click to expand...

... Whoever wins the final battle between Smith & Root as all time leading catcher will hold it for quite some time... maybe even for good as there is absolutely nobody within distance of them at the moment & the nature of cricket these days in relation to tests.

Root with his larger volume of tests for England at his disposal (barring injury) will most likely kick on have it as Smith definitely won't play as long as him IMO.
 
Burgey

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
wtf? It’s a great selection.

Murphy made zero impact last test and is meant to be a specialist. If Connolly doesn’t bowl another over he’s been as good as Murphy was last test, and he knows which end of a bat to hold.
 
TheJediBrah

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
halba said:
stats explainable- ricky ponting had flatter wickets during his era, Smith had lots of tougher wickets for batters(especially in the past 5-6 years, early on he had flatter wickets) so more catches taken. Also the batters were better during Pontings era- he had to deal with peak Indian and South african batting units. SAF was basically a 2nd australia at times.

Pakistan, SL, even Windies all had proper batting lineups in those days, they dont now, theyre all basically minnows now.

Thats why its tough to compare different eras. Quality of the teams now are ***
Click to expand...
It's simpler than that. Ponting didn't field at slip to the spinners, ever. That would probably make up the difference between the 2 alone
 
Gnske

Gnske

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
TheJediBrah said:
It's simpler than that. Ponting didn't field at slip to the spinners, ever. That would probably make up the difference between the 2 alone
Click to expand...
Less consistent competition of lazy batsmen in the slips as well. Head doesn't go there, Marnus is all over the shop, Usman was a terrible short leg at first then used somewhat as a ring fielder in between his droppings before he earned the privilege of not having to run ever again. Warner's been his only consistent company throughout the last decade..

Checked the footage from the ban era, not surprised at all Usman filled in for spin at first slip lmao.
 
R

RossTaylorsBox

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Prince EWS said:
Hey @Shady Slim, can you remind me how many First Class wickets Connolly has? I've forgotten.

Feel free to let us know how many wickets he's taken in his four white ball international appearances too. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Four is also the number of bowlers Sri Lanka used when Australia put up that huge score, wish somebody could find out if that's the highest one there is when a team has used four bowlers...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top