BlackCap_Fan
State Vice-Captain
NZ vs India in 2003 (I think).
Those were some of the worst pitches. Ever.
Those were some of the worst pitches. Ever.
I think a completely one sided Test Series is worseFaaipDeOiad said:My vote is the last series between India and New Zealand on Indian soil. I don't think any test series is universally boring, but you can't get much worse than two tame draws on dead flat pitches.
I don't. At least a completely one-sided series can have great individual efforts from both batters and bowlers on either side, a series with nothing but tame draws on flat wickets offers nothing. Batting efforts are dulled by the easy nature of play, and bowlers can't do anything. It's just boring cricket to watch, and I hate flat pitches more than anything.chaminda_00 said:I think a completely one sided Test Series is worse
How could that be boring? Mumbai in 2004 was a poor wicket, it was still absolutely fascinating cricket with something happening every minute. I don't know how watching cricket on a minefield could be more boring than watching it on a road. That's like a trainwreck being more boring than watching paint dry.BlackCap_Fan said:NZ vs India in 2003 (I think).
Those were some of the worst pitches. Ever.
or grass growFaaipDeOiad said:That's like a trainwreck being more boring than watching paint dry.![]()
I rather see a contest, but both are pretty boringFaaipDeOiad said:I don't. At least a completely one-sided series can have great individual efforts from both batters and bowlers on either side, a series with nothing but tame draws on flat wickets offers nothing. Batting efforts are dulled by the easy nature of play, and bowlers can't do anything. It's just boring cricket to watch, and I hate flat pitches more than anything.![]()
That contradicts itself.neutralguy said:IF you do not like the post do not criticize a person.Rather do not post your reply.Everybody has freedom here to say what they want.
That a bit harsh there not too many bowlers outside the Australian Team that are better bowlers then Vaas, Murali and Kumble.Slats4ever said:definately SL v India. neither side can bowl that great
But not Murali, also Bradshaw, Tuffey and Sami u sure about those onesSlats4ever said:Akhtar, Bond, Harmison, Flintoff, Kaneria, Ntini, Pollock, Bradshaw, Tuffey, Hoggard and Sami all have claims to be included on the same level as Vaas and maybe even Kumble in my opinion
How is that boring you one of the best bowlers of all time aganist a brillant batting line with one of the all time great, Tendulkar. Kumble aganist the solid Sri Lanka batting line isn't boring either. It is the 1-on-1 battles that make a Test interesting.Slats4ever said:nah not really but i needed them to make my response look more solid.. hehe.. Tuffey yeah..
Murali for sure but he can only do it from one end. Also both the SL and Indian batting line up's quite good so it didn't look like either side was going to get out cheap.
boring cos murali and kumble got belted all around the parkchaminda_00 said:How is that boring you one of the best bowlers of all time aganist a brillant batting line with one of the all time great, Tendulkar. Kumble aganist the solid Sri Lanka batting line isn't boring either. It is the 1-on-1 battles that make a Test interesting.
They may not have as much success but i think being belted all over the park is a bit over the top. They still tested the respective batsmen which is more then the Windies bowlers did aganist Australia in 2000/01.Slats4ever said:boring cos murali and kumble got belted all around the park
mmm i would tendto agree with you there, i think i will abstain from this poll as it is largely pointless.Right arm fast said:none of the series imo look to boring to me but nt every1s the same i spose