• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Kuldeep yadav vs Brad Hogg

Who is better ODI bowler?


  • Total voters
    28

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
Kuldeeps transformation has been interesting. Very rarely see a bowler like him get figured out, then add 5-10 km's and come back better than ever.
 

Silver Silva

International Debutant
Yeah because he has already achieved what Hogg achieved in his entire career. Now as Kuldeep has a lot of games left, he will past go him to become the greatest chinaman.
Brad Hogg has won two world cups and a champions trophy (Basically 3 World Cups since all the teams who can realistically win a WC compete in it) , Kuldeep Yadav has won nothing yet. Brad Hogg took 34 WC wickets at 19 , Kuldeep has 11 wickets in WC @ 41 ..He's still a rookie in comparison to Brad Hogg
 

Saket1209

State Vice-Captain
Brad Hogg has won two world cups and a champions trophy (Basically 3 World Cups since all the teams who can realistically win a WC compete in it) , Kuldeep Yadav has won nothing yet. Brad Hogg took 34 WC wickets at 19 , Kuldeep has 11 wickets in WC @ 41 ..He's still a rookie in comparison to Brad Hogg
Why do you bring WC win while comparing player. WC is won by a team and it has nothing to do with a player calliber.
SO according to u SREESANTH> CURTLY AMBROSE OR DALE STEYN OR RICHARD HADLEE
And to counter your second point Kuldeep was at his lowest in 2019 and 2020 and he has worked on himself and now he is a completely different bolwer. Just wait and watch his wc records this year.
 

Saket1209

State Vice-Captain
Jimmy Anderson the best fast bowler of all time too
No because apart from Longetivity he doesn't have anything in his favour. But for kuldeep their stats are more or less same and then kuldeep has so many years left. So basically he has longetivity plus everything Hogg has. So Kuldeep> Hogg
 

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
Why do you bring WC win while comparing player. WC is won by a team and it has nothing to do with a player calliber.
SO according to u SREESANTH> CURTLY AMBROSE OR DALE STEYN OR RICHARD HADLEE
And to counter your second point Kuldeep was at his lowest in 2019 and 2020 and he has worked on himself and now he is a completely different bolwer. Just wait and watch his wc records this year.
He bought it up cause Hogg has a great wc record and played a part in AUS winning two world cups while kuldeep has a poor wc record and hasn't won anything? This could change if India win this WC, but given their similiar records, using WC performance as a measuring stick to stack them up seems fair.
 

Saket1209

State Vice-Captain
He bought it up cause Hogg has a great wc record and played a part in AUS winning two world cups while kuldeep has a poor wc record and hasn't won anything? This could change if India win this WC, but given their similiar records, using WC performance as a measuring stick to stack them up seems fair.
SO brian lara is the worst player. Doesn't have a wc and didn't performed great in wc.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
No because apart from Longetivity he doesn't have anything in his favour. But for kuldeep their stats are more or less same and then kuldeep has so many years left. So basically he has longetivity plus everything Hogg has. So Kuldeep> Hogg
Flawless reasoning
 

Saket1209

State Vice-Captain
He bought it up cause Hogg has a great wc record and played a part in AUS winning two world cups while kuldeep has a poor wc record and hasn't won anything? This could change if India win this WC, but given their similiar records, using WC performance as a measuring stick to stack them up seems fair.
WC Wins comes by a team not alone. Even Munaf patel has a wc and has got wickets that doesn't mean he is better than marshall who was quite ordinary in wc. A player should be judged by his performance not by his team. If that was the case then all players from england are garbage becasue they haven't won till 2019
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
WC Wins comes by a team not alone. Even Munaf patel has a wc and has got wickets that doesn't mean he is better than marshall who was quite ordinary in wc. A player should be judged by his performance not by his team. If that was the case then all players from england are garbage becasue they haven't won till 2019
I don't see the issue

Also they technically still haven't won
 

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
SO brian lara is the worst player. Doesn't have a wc and didn't performed great in wc.
Did I say or imply that? Just saying performance on the highest stage seems a good way to compare players with otherwise similiar records. Don't think that's a controversial take, is it?
 

Saket1209

State Vice-Captain
Did I say or imply that? Just saying performance on the highest stage seems a good way to compare players with otherwise similiar records. Don't think that's a controversial take, is it?
It can be a good take to compare players on their wc performance but not the team wc performance. But a player can not only be judged on one parameter. And you are trying to prove your point on the basis of just Hogg WC performance. And Kuldeep can play another wc who knows his record can be better than that of Hogg.
 

Top