Joel Garner vs Dennis Lillee

[subshakerz]

Funnily enough, I consider Ambrose the complete opposite bowler to Steyn.

Steyns action is skidding the ball through the crease while Ambrose delivers it from a big height.

Steyn took wickets at record pace but was very expensive. Ambrose took them cheaply but relatively slowly.

Ambrose rocked Aus and England where Steyn often got stick while Steyn rocked SC where Ambrose didn't do much.

 

[subshakerz]

Yeah he's not completely unreasonable, like your posts.

And your face.

You're just annoyed at being called out. Don't worry getting humbled is good for your growth.

 

[Johan]

You're just annoyed at being called out. Don't worry getting humbled is good for your growth.

2/10 comeback really bad, you need to work on speechcheck.

 

[subshakerz]

2/10 comeback really bad, you need to work on speechcheck.

Im not too fussed if you want to take this as a victory. At least you're passionate about your players.

 

[Johan]

Im not too fussed if you want to take this as a victory.

What?

 

[subshakerz]

What?

Whatever.

Btw do you rate Donald ahead of Trueman?

 

[Johan]

Whatever.

Btw do you rate Donald ahead of Trueman?

I don't, I've posted my pacers list before, Trueman and Lillee are at 8-9

 

[subshakerz]

I don't, I've posted my pacers list before, Trueman and Lillee are at 8-9

Well we agree there.

 

[Johan]

Well we agree there.

Yeah

 

[Prince EWS]

You're just annoyed at being called out. Don't worry getting humbled is good for your growth.

Face/posts is a meme, dude.

 

[subshakerz]

Face/posts is a meme, dude.

Bro I know that by now haha. I just never engage in it.

 

[DrWolverine]

Ambrose rocked Aus and England where Steyn often got stick while Steyn rocked SC where Ambrose didn't do much.

Steyn’s average against Australia may not top the charts but his strike rate of 46 and 4.6 wickets per match is as good as any great in history.

He was the ultimate match winner and his twin five-wicket hauls in a single Test ended Australia’s fifteen-year dominance in a home series

 

[Coronis]

Face/posts is a meme, dude.

Just like your posts. And your face.

 

[Prince EWS]

Bro I know that by now haha. I just never engage in it.

It's not meant to be taken seriously as an insult lol

 

[subshakerz]

Steyn’s average against Australia may not top the charts but his strike rate of 46 and 4.6 wickets per match is as good as any great in history.

He was the ultimate match winner and his twin five-wicket hauls in a single Test ended Australia’s fifteen-year dominance in a home series

Sure I didn't say he failed in Aus and Eng. Even in England he has two matchwinning spells.

 

[subshakerz]

Steyn’s average against Australia may not top the charts but his strike rate of 46 and 4.6 wickets per match is as good as any great in history.

He was the ultimate match winner and his twin five-wicket hauls in a single Test ended Australia’s fifteen-year dominance in a home series

Btw you have just highlighted something important. This CW is too wedded to low averages as the main indication of bowler success than wickets and wicket taking rates.

 

[DrWolverine]

A low average is good but wickets per match is also important.

 

[Johan]

If the sample size is low, all that matter is winning games or serieses for your team, or giving that level of performances, rest is all hogwash

 

[subshakerz]

If the sample size is low, all that matter is winning games or serieses for your team, or giving that level of performances, rest is all hogwash

Obviously. What is sample size is large?

 

[Johan]

Obviously. What is sample size is large?

then I guess averages + strike rates + marquee performances come more into play and you need all three to be regarded as great