Al Salvador
School Boy/Girl Captain
I don't get you putting worrell above may as a batsman either, we just see things differently
Fair. Siraj can bowl long spells of trash too while raising his game at times.Not a valid comparison , Siraj has to be more consistent
Don't think so tbh. He had the potential to be a great bowler. Pace, swing, control he had almost the complete skill set to be a great bowler, top 20-30 all time imo potentially.Srinath pretty much maximized the potential he had at his disposal.
You asked me why I rate srinath highly, basically you covered all what I feel about himDon't think so tbh. He had the potential to be a great bowler. Pace, swing, control he had almost the complete skill set to be a great bowler, top 20-30 all time imo potentially.
Yeah but this is potential, which he had. His performances sadly couldn't do justice to it.You asked me why I rate srinath highly, basically you covered all what I feel about him
Career of two halves really. He was extremely erratic and frail till about '94. Then he gained some weight, nailed down his action, developed reverse in SC conditions and the ball that held its line. His length never really crept up that extra yard though which is why he always looked great and had batsmen jumping around, but the big hauls never arrived.Don't think so tbh. He had the potential to be a great bowler. Pace, swing, control he had almost the complete skill set to be a great bowler, top 20-30 all time imo potentially.
Yeah agreed. If he had bowled that little fuller like you said, I think he then justifies the potential he had.Career of two halves really. He was extremely erratic till about '94. Then he nailed down his action, developed reverse in SC conditions and the ball that held its line. His length never really crept up that extra yard though which is why he always looked great and had batsmen jumping around, but the big hauls never arrived.
Srinath said in an interview that it took him long to figure out the correct length to bowl. Not that much potential to be a great bowler imho.Don't think so tbh. He had the potential to be a great bowler. Pace, swing, control he had almost the complete skill set to be a great bowler, top 20-30 all time imo potentially.
By potential I meant the a raw skill like pace which can't be taught. He even had swing and reverse swing in his armory. We have seen guys like Ishant adjust their lengths mid career and go fuller. The potential was there imo.Srinath said in an interview that it took him long to figure out the correct length to bowl. Not that much potential to be a great bowler imho.
Biggest problem was he was a big teddy bear. If he was half angry as Siraj, i don't want to be facing it.Career of two halves really. He was extremely erratic and frail till about '94. Then he gained some weight, nailed down his action, developed reverse in SC conditions and the ball that held its line. His length never really crept up that extra yard though which is why he always looked great and had batsmen jumping around, but the big hauls never arrived.
Remember seeing him visibly shaken when he bloodied some South African on an early tour, Pringle or Snell, not sure. Not dissimilar to your countryman Ratnayake.Biggest problem was he was a big teddy bear. If he was half angry as Siraj, i don't want to be facing it.
He broke Lanka de Silva's nose. But the keeper returned to bat. Never bowled a single bouncer at the injured man. Siraj would have showered bouncers. He is a proper arsehole on cricket pitch.Remember seeing him visibly shaken when he bloodied some South African on an early tour, Pringle or Snell, not sure. Not dissimilar to your countryman Ratnayake.