• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

If Bradman played in today's era?

How would Sir Donald Bradman go in today's era of cricket?


  • Total voters
    87

Migara

Cricketer Of The Year
According to "opinionators"

1. Bradman would average 255134671 if he played today
2. Frank Tyson bowled at 110mph
3. Larwood bowled at 105mph
4. Thompson bowled at 120mph
5. Cricket has regressed for 70 years, while all other sports including baseball has progressed.
 

the big bambino

International Captain
According to "opinionators"

1. Bradman would average 255134671 if he played today
2. Frank Tyson bowled at 110mph
3. Larwood bowled at 105mph
4. Thompson bowled at 120mph
5. Cricket has regressed for 70 years, while all other sports including baseball has progressed.
You really have too much ego invested in players like akhtar Lee and in other circumstances murali. It’s degrades your contributions, usually poor anyway, into utter fatuity.
 

Chrish

International Debutant
It's impossible for any bowler to consistently bowl in 150s let alone 160s. That famous Shaun Tait over where he bowled in 150s for example; how often was he able to replicate that? Conversely, Archer really cranked it up in the first game with well over 90 miles deliveries but then he wasn't able to come close in rest of the games.

An express pacer bowls around 145 km with occasional 148-150km deliveries. 160 km is something like once in a lifetime thing. And if any bowler in the history of the game was able to bowl 170 km, we would have seen at least few others who would have come close to that. It's not like we have had a dearth of express bowlers all these years.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's impossible for any bowler to consistently bowl in 150s let alone 160s. That famous Shaun Tait over where he bowled in 150s for example; how often was he able to replicate that? Conversely, Archer really cranked it up in the first game with well over 90 miles deliveries but then he wasn't able to come close in rest of the games.

An express pacer bowls around 145 km with occasional 148-150km deliveries. 160 km is something like once in a lifetime thing. And if any bowler in the history of the game was able to bowl 170 km, we would have seen at least few others who would have come close to that. It's not like we have had a dearth of express bowlers all these years.
Pretty often for a fair chunk of his career tbh. His problem was he sprayed it all over the place most of the time.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Atul Sharma hurled it down at 175kph I'm pretty sure.
I loved the way the broader Indian fan base just lapped up that he was the fastest bowler in the world, despite no one ever having actually seen him bowl.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
You can actually calculate that based on the the stage of the bowler's action and the distance travelled by the ball (calculated via measuring circumference of the object in relation to distance of the camera) and of course the players shadows and that's a big woman at the back there isn't it
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Look at how thin that stick is. That's gonna vibrate more than your mum's top drawer.
 

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
Atul Sharma hurled it down at 175kph I'm pretty sure.
There have been some absurd things posted in this thread, sure. But the mere suggestion that an Indian quick could bowl anywhere near 160, let alone 175, really takes the cake, and takes the piss.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
There have been some absurd things posted in this thread, sure. But the mere suggestion that an Indian quick could bowl anywhere near 160, let alone 175, really takes the cake, and takes the piss.
you really do take everything seriously don't you
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
There have been some absurd things posted in this thread, sure. But the mere suggestion that an Indian quick could bowl anywhere near 160, let alone 175, really takes the cake, and takes the piss.
Australia is slowly becoming like the India of old. You guys put a vegetarian medium pacer on the park for 3 of the most important tests of the calendar and your most popular player is a balding skinny fat spinner.
 

Migara

Cricketer Of The Year
There have been some absurd things posted in this thread, sure. But the mere suggestion that an Indian quick could bowl anywhere near 160, let alone 175, really takes the cake, and takes the piss.
You seems to be bloody serious . . .

Athul Sharma was a bad joke . . .
Rivalled only by "bobs and vegene" jokes.
 

Top