Not at all - it's one of the more meaningful, insightful comments which has been made on Cricketweb for some time, and I wholeheartedly concur.one_dayer said:How about England open batting with Harmisson, give him an Afridi like role, let him swing that tree trunk of a bat he uses at every ball instead of wasteing him at the bottom of the order!!
Im going to get flamed now![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
one_dayer said:How about England open batting with Harmisson, give him an Afridi like role, let him swing that tree trunk of a bat he uses at every ball instead of wasteing him at the bottom of the order!!
Im going to get flamed now![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Some of Harmisons hitting this summer has been breathtaking (in a really funny way)Nnanden said:as much as this comment is similar to that of indian fans wanting pathan to open, perhaps this isnt a completely bad idea... perhaps.
They did. Not that it paid off.steds said:England did send Richard Johnson in at 3 sometime last season. Didn't they?
There's hope for Harmy yet...you never know, we might end up with 2 Flintoff's
No, they are not - one of the top two is not an opener and the two below him both are.marc71178 said:The top 4 are all openers as it is!
As it almost never does when you promote tail-enders to try to slog good bowling.Craig said:They did. Not that it paid off.
That's so right.Richard said:As it almost never does when you promote tail-enders to try to slog good bowling.
fun to watch thoughluckyeddie said:That's so right.
The tail can make hay on occasion when they are up against tired bowlers using an old ball, and that's about it.
Difference between those two is, Harmison can bat....one_dayer said:How about England open batting with Harmisson, give him an Afridi like role, let him swing that tree trunk of a bat he uses at every ball instead of wasteing him at the bottom of the order!!
Im going to get flamed now![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yeah, I bet Afridi can't play the reverse sweep like Harmy. Harmy's gonna break Afridi's 37-ball hundred record in the Ashes ODIs next year, you heard it here first!Langeveldt said:Difference between those two is, Harmison can bat....
In Srinath's 5 innings in WC99 he batted as follows: nine, eight, eight, eight, seven.Barney Rubble said:Didn't Harmison smack a 95mph Brett Lee delivery for six last time England were out in Australia? He got 20* I think in the one match England won.
Not a great idea promoting him, but not the worst I've ever heard. Although Johnson is a better slogger than Harmy and he got 0 at no3.
Javagal Srinath did a good job of it at the 99 World Cup, as I remember - it works every now and again.