• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Harry brook era

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
It will get overlooked with the emphasis on Root (quite rightly) however it should be highlighted.
I was looking forward to how He was going to settle in then accelerate the scoring.

Pitch was flat, show some application then get into it.
 

Ju7

U19 12th Man
I was looking forward to how He was going to settle in then accelerate the scoring.

Pitch was flat, show some application then get into it.
His shot reminded me of a schoolboy who can't play spin and just runs down the pitch to look pro active.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
There's not one good young batter with a solid orthodox technique coming through the ranks of any test side at the moment. Not one. All are dashers and sloggers. Jaiswal, Brook, Jamie Smith.. Test batting RIP
 

Molehill

International Coach
There's not one good young batter with a solid orthodox technique coming through the ranks of any test side at the moment. Not one. All are dashers and sloggers. Jaiswal, Brook, Jamie Smith.. Test batting RIP
I think you could include Smith. He's literally made his name in FC Cricket playing for Surrey, his attacking shots are far more orthodox than the others. It remains to be seen whether opening for England in limited overs matches affects that, but he's far more solid than most.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
The style isn't exactly carry long term viability.
Was curious about this. Just looking overall it doesn’t seem more aggressive players necessarily decline earlier than others. Some might even improve. Its hard to tell from the relatively low sample size, and age is a factor in decline for all players. The data might pan out more with many more extremely aggressive batsmen playing currently than previously.

Found something interesting though, looking at one of the more famous hyper aggressors.

Sehwag in his 20’s (2001-2008)
5333 @ 52.28 SR 77.41

Sehwag in his 30’s (2008-2013)
3253 @ 45.18 SR 91.58
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Was curious about this. Just looking overall it doesn’t seem more aggressive players necessarily decline earlier than others. Some might even improve. Its hard to tell from the relatively low sample size, and age is a factor in decline for all players. The data might pan out more with many more extremely aggressive batsmen playing currently than previously.

Found something interesting though, looking at one of the more famous hyper aggressors.

Sehwag in his 20’s (2001-2008)
5333 @ 52.28 SR 77.41

Sehwag in his 30’s (2008-2013)
3253 @ 45.18 SR 91.58
Even today he was quite lucky to make it out of single figures.

There's a way to do it, settle in, get your eye in and then you can do whatever you desire.

Think it was mentioned at some point during the series how many chances he receives per innings, not always going to be that lucky.

And he has the talent to be an ATG.
 

Top