It will get overlooked with the emphasis on Root (quite rightly) however it should be highlighted.
It will get overlooked with the emphasis on Root (quite rightly) however it should be highlighted.
I was looking forward to how He was going to settle in then accelerate the scoring.It will get overlooked with the emphasis on Root (quite rightly) however it should be highlighted.
His shot reminded me of a schoolboy who can't play spin and just runs down the pitch to look pro active.I was looking forward to how He was going to settle in then accelerate the scoring.
Pitch was flat, show some application then get into it.
His name is Washington Sundar.There's not one good young batter with a solid orthodox technique coming through the ranks of any test side at the moment. Not one. All are dashers and sloggers. Jaiswal, Brook, Jamie Smith.. Test batting RIP
I think you could include Smith. He's literally made his name in FC Cricket playing for Surrey, his attacking shots are far more orthodox than the others. It remains to be seen whether opening for England in limited overs matches affects that, but he's far more solid than most.There's not one good young batter with a solid orthodox technique coming through the ranks of any test side at the moment. Not one. All are dashers and sloggers. Jaiswal, Brook, Jamie Smith.. Test batting RIP
There's not one good young batter with a solid orthodox technique coming through the ranks of any test side at the moment. Not one. All are dashers and sloggers. Jaiswal, Brook, Jamie Smith.. Test batting RIP
Points for the meme, not the sentiment.
The style doesn't exactly carry long term viability.Absolute in my day merchants on this forum these days
Harry Brook is the future, DEAL WITH IT
Viv Richard was the West Indian Harry Brook.The English Viv Richards
Was curious about this. Just looking overall it doesn’t seem more aggressive players necessarily decline earlier than others. Some might even improve. Its hard to tell from the relatively low sample size, and age is a factor in decline for all players. The data might pan out more with many more extremely aggressive batsmen playing currently than previously.The style isn't exactly carry long term viability.
No. Vivian had an excellent technique and was much more judicial in his shot selection.The English Viv Richards
Even today he was quite lucky to make it out of single figures.Was curious about this. Just looking overall it doesn’t seem more aggressive players necessarily decline earlier than others. Some might even improve. Its hard to tell from the relatively low sample size, and age is a factor in decline for all players. The data might pan out more with many more extremely aggressive batsmen playing currently than previously.
Found something interesting though, looking at one of the more famous hyper aggressors.
Sehwag in his 20’s (2001-2008)
5333 @ 52.28 SR 77.41
Sehwag in his 30’s (2008-2013)
3253 @ 45.18 SR 91.58
He is what the kids these days want in a batsmanIs anybody seriously still pretending that Harry Brook isn't a disgusting indictment on the times we live in?