mr_mister
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yes, another one.
Very similar to the Batting averages one, though this won't have decimal places so it'l be easier to calculate!
Will start when I get around 10-12 names
Since his selection is not really detrimental this time around(relatively) Bradman is not allowed.
Must have played a minimum of 1 test inning. As stated in the title, the 1000 is not set in stone, it just seemed like a nice even number. It will possibly end up being too low, so if anyone has a better suggestion(such as 1100 or 1200) let your opinion be known
Very similar to the Batting averages one, though this won't have decimal places so it'l be easier to calculate!

Will start when I get around 10-12 names
Since his selection is not really detrimental this time around(relatively) Bradman is not allowed.
Must have played a minimum of 1 test inning. As stated in the title, the 1000 is not set in stone, it just seemed like a nice even number. It will possibly end up being too low, so if anyone has a better suggestion(such as 1100 or 1200) let your opinion be known